CSC peer review process is essential part of CSC Journals vision of EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION RESEARH AND SERVICES. The rationale of CSC Peer review process is to validate the integrity and novelty of the research work. Like most of the renowned research publishers, CSC Journals relies on efficient peer review process to endorse not only the quality of publications but also the integrity of its individual research journals. Being the most important element in scholarly publications, peer review process adopted by CSC Journals not only acts as a filter but also plays a vital role to increase the quality of research submitted for journal publications. Because of its mentoring nature CSC peer review process also helps author(s) to remove any errors or gaps in manuscript mistakenly overlooked and assists in making the research more applicable in real time.

Respected for its International reputation, the editorial and reviewer boards of CSC Journals comprised experts with not only having the academic background but also the researchers serving the industry. All our editorial and reviewer board members are at least Ph.D scholars who are dedicated to ensure the validity and originality of journal publications. Thus making CSC journals a constructive platform for practical implications of academic research that can be used by professionals performing qualitative jobs. CSC peer review process ensures that the scholarly manuscripts are evaluated and commented upon by independent experts belonging to the same research interest and area.

CSC peer review process is based upon single blind review where reviewer's name is concealed from the author(s). In order to ensure that only non plagiarized, original and high quality research publications each manuscript is assigned to at least three editors and each editor is assigned not more than two manuscripts. This is to ensure that editors are not overburdened with the review of assigned papers. Each editor further assigns manuscript to multiple reviewers. Our editors are well known experts in their respective areas and we have seen that our editors sometimes assign a manuscript to two to five reviewers depending upon availability of their peers. Reviewers assess the manuscript for critical analysis, comparative analysis and most importantly for integrity and novelty of research work.

Each manuscript is evaluated through concrete parameters set by CSC Journals and editorial board members. These parameters reflect different aspects of the submitted manuscript including the research quality, paper formatting and more importantly reference/citations. Once the reviewers submit review comments of the paper then the relevant (assigned) editor analyses the review comments and submit his remarks to Editor In Chief (EIC). Similarly all editors who are assigned manuscripts follow the same procedure. At the end EIC ensures that at least three review comments (from reviewers) and editors’ remarks are submitted for each paper in order to make the final decision of the manuscript. This whole review process take place in 45 days after submission date of issue publication.

As plagiarism is a serious offence, the CSC peer review process is designed to make sure that no part of the published research work is plagiarized. Our dedicated editorial/reviewer boards follow strict plagiarism policies, set as standards by CSC Journals. CSC Journals reserves the right to act promptly against the author(s) convicted for plagiarism offense. Authors presenting misquoted information, whether accidental or intentional are liable to give satisfactory explanation for plagiarism offense. In case if author(s) fail to satisfy CSC Journals, we will contact director/dean/vice chancellor of author(s) institute.