List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
The Three Dimensions of Security
Full text
 PDF(162.4KB)
Source 
International Journal of Security (IJS)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(1.81MB)
Volume:  5    Issue:  2
Pages:  NULL
Publication Date:   July / August 2011
ISSN (Online): 1985-2320
Pages 
85 - 93
Author(s)  
Malik F. Saleh - Saudi Arabia
 
Published Date   
05-10-2011 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   Dimensions of Security, Security, Policy, People, Enforcement of Security 
 
 
This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:-
1. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
2. Scribd
3. Google Scholar
4. Docstoc
 
 
Security is an issue of generally recognized importance. Security starts with you, the user. It is well known that a formal security policy is a prerequisite of security. Having a policy and being able to enforce it is a totally different thing. This paper explains the three aspects of security that should be combined to create a well-rounded solution for securing organizations. This solution examines people, policy and enforcement as three dimensions in the world of security. This paper serves as 1) a conceptual framework for securing organization 2) the basis for formal policy-to-enforcement; 3) It raises awareness that the users should be informed of their roles and responsibilities in protecting the organization; and 4) evidence for writing policies that can be implemented and enforcement involves understanding the policies by the users 
 
 
 
1 Saleh, M.F., Information Security Maturity Model International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), 2011. 5(3): p. 21.
2 David, J., Policy enforcement in the workplace. Computers & Security, 2002. 21(6): p. 506-513.
3 Madigan, E.M., C. Petrulich, and K. Motuk, The cost of non-compliance: when policies fail, in Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference. 2004, ACM: Baltimore, MD, USA. p. 47-51.
4 Norman, D.A., The Way I See it: When security gets in the way. interactions, 2009. 16(6): p. 60-63.
5 Vidyaraman, S., M. Chandrasekaran, and S. Upadhyaya, Position: the user is the enemy, in Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on New Security Paradigms. 2008, ACM: New Hampshire. p. 75-80.
6 Schneier, B., Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. 2000, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7 Corporation, M. The Enemy Within. 2005 [cited June 20; Available from: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/15/mcafee_internal_security_survey/.
8 Adams, A. and M.A. Sasse, Users are not the enemy. Communications of the ACM, 1999. 42(12).
9 Gross, J. and M.B. Rosson. Looking for Trouble: Understanding End-User Security Management. in Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT) 2007.
10 Sasse, M.A., S. Brostoff, and D. Weirich, Transforming the 'Weakest Link' - a Human/Computer Interaction Approach to Usable and Effective Security. BT Technology Journal, 2001. 19(3): p. 122-131.
11 Kumaraguru, P., et al., Teaching Johnny not to fall for phish. ACM Trans. Internet Technol., 2010. 10(2): p. 1-31.
12 Gupta, S., R.P. Bostrom, and M. Huber, End-user training methods: what we know, need to know. SIGMIS Database, 2010. 41(4): p. 9-39.
13 Compeau, D., et al., End-user training and learning. Commun. ACM, 1995. 38(7): p. 24-26.
14 McCoy, C. and R.T. Fowler, "You are the key to security": establishing a successful security awareness program, in Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference. 2004, ACM: Baltimore, MD, USA. p. 346-349.
15 Höne, K. and J.H.P. Eloff, Information security policy what do international information security standards say? Computers & Security, 2002. 21(5): p. 402-409
16 Schneider, F.B., Enforceable security policies. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2000. 3(1): p. 30-50.
17 Craig, J.S., The human element: training, awareness, and human resources implications of health information security policy under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), in 2009 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference. 2009, ACM: Kennesaw, Georgia. p. 95-99.
18 Johnson, M., et al., Optimizing a policy authoring framework for security and privacy policies, in Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. 2010, ACM: Redmond, Washington. p. 1-9.
19 Hall, D.E., Requirements and policy challenges in highly secure environments, in Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 2004, ACM: Paris, France. p. 897-898.
20 Solmsa, B.v. and R.v. Solms, The 10 deadly sins of information security management. Computers & Security, 2004. 23: p. 371-376.
21 Bird, T. What is policy enforcement, and why should we care? 2004; Available from: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/98080/What_is_policy_enforcement_and_why_should_we_care_?taxonomyId=17&pageNumber=3.
22 Group, T.C. Trusted Network Connect. 2010 [cited 2011 June 28]; Available from: http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/developers/trusted_network_connect/.
23 Cisco. Network Admission Control. 2011 [cited 2011 June 28]; Available from: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_nac.html.
24 Microsoft. Network Access Protection. 2011 [cited 2011 June 28]; Available from: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/nap-main.aspx.
25 Robling, G. and M. Muller, Social engineering: a serious underestimated problem. SIGCSE Bull., 2009. 41(3): p. 384-384.
26 Kvedar, D., M. Nettis, and S.P. Fulton, The use of formal social engineering techniques to identify weaknesses during a computer vulnerability competition. J. Comput. Small Coll., 2010. 26(2): p. 80-87.
27 Orgill, G.L., et al., The urgency for effective user privacy-education to counter social engineering attacks on secure computer systems, in Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education. 2004, ACM: Salt Lake City, UT, USA. p. 177-181.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Malik F. Saleh : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.