List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
Texting Satisfaction: Does Age and Gender Make a Difference?
Full text
 PDF(107.1KB)
Source 
International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(1.56MB)
Volume:  1    Issue:  1
Pages:  1-96
Publication Date:   June 2007
ISSN (Online): 1985-1553
Pages 
85 - 96
Author(s)  
 
Published Date   
30-06-2007 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   Age, Gender, Texting satisfaction, Text entry factors, Structured questionnaire interview 
 
 
This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:-
1. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
2. Scribd
3. PDFCAST
4. Docstoc
5. Google Scholar
6. WorldCat
7. CiteSeerX
8. Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)
9. ResearchGATE
10. refSeek
11. Academic Index
12. Socol@r
13. Microsoft Academic Search
14. iSEEK
15. Google Books
16. Academic Journals Database
17. Libsearch
18. slideshare
 
 
This study investigated the effect of age and gender on mobile phone users’ texting satisfaction, focusing on text entry factors. Structured questionnaire interviews were used to interview 18 subjects of both genders, aged between 17–37 years. Analysis of variance was computed. Gender effect was found on the speed of text entry method (p = 0.027), with the females being more satisfied than males. Age has a significant effect on navigation (p = 0.026) and learnability (p < 0.001), with the younger groups being more satisfied than the older groups. A significant interaction was found between age and gender for learnability (p = 0.039), with a clear difference between genders in the twenties and thirties. Results suggest that age and gender affect users’ texting satisfaction, with varying text entry factors. Results obtained can be used to improve text entry methods by (i) catering to local dialects (ii) reducing key overloading or introducing a better method for text entry. It is concluded that texting satisfaction awaits improvements to the text entry methods. 
 
 
 
1 Axup, J., Viller, S. and Bidwell, N., 2005, Usability of a Mobile, Group Communication Prototype While Rendezvousing. In CTS’05 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems-Special Session on Mobile Collaborative Work (St. Louis).
2 Buchanan, G., Jones, M., Thimbleby, H., Farrant, S. and Pazzani, M., 2001, Improving Mobile Internet Usability. In Web 2001 Conference (Hong Kong, ACM Press).
3 Bunce, D., and Sisa, L, 2002, Age differences in perceived workload across a short vigil. Ergonomics, 45, pp. 949–960.
4 Cockburn, A. and Siresena, A., 2003, Evaluating Mobile Text Entry with the Fastap Keypad. In British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, England.
5 Faulkner, X. and Culwin, F., 2005, When Fingers Do The Talking: A Study of Text Messaging. Interacting with Computers, 17, pp. 167–185.
6 Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W., 1997, Gender differences in the perception of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, December 1997, pp.389–400.
7 Gong, J. and Tarasewich, P., 2005, Alphabetically Constrained Keypad Designs for Text Entry on Mobile Devices. In CHI 2005, PAPERS: Small Devices 1, pp. 211–220.
8 Gong, J., Haggerty, B. and Tarasewich, P., 2005, An Enhanced Multitap with Predictive Next- Letter Highlighting. In CHI 2005, Oregon, USA.
9 Grinter, R. and Eldridge, M., 2001, y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?. In Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW, Bonn, Germany.
10 Grudin, J., 2001, Partitioning Digital World: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In Human Factors and Computing Systems, CHI’01, Seattle, USA.
11 Gwin, P., 2005, Making the Connection: The Jump From Wired to Wireless is Changing Africa, National Geographic (September 2005).
12 James, C.L. and Reischel, K.M., 2001, Text Input for Mobile Devices: Comparing Model Prediction to Actual Performance. CHI 2001, 3, pp. 365–371.
13 Kanlayanaphotporn, K., Trott, P., Williams, M. and Fulton, I., 2003, Effects of chronic low back pain, age and gender ion vertical spinal creep. Ergonomics, 46, pp. 561–573.
14 Kent,J., 2003, Malaysia Reviews Texting Divorce. Available online at:www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3112151.htm (accessed August 2006).
15 Lewis, A., 2005, Hve I told U l8tly that I luv u?: Mobile phones: The New Domesticated Artefact. Australian Counseling Association Journal “Counseling Australia”, 5.
16 Lightner, N.J., 2003, What users want in e-commerce design: effects of age, education and income. Ergonomics, 46, pp. 153 – 168.
17 Ling, R., 2001, “We Release Them Little by Little”: Maturation and Gender Identity as Seen in the Use of Mobile Telephony. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5, pp. 123–136.
18 Ling, R., 2003, The Socio-linguistic of SMS: An Analysis of SMS Use by a Random Sample of Norwegians. In Mobile Communications: Renegotiation of the Social Sphere , Ling, R. and Pedersen, P. (Eds.), pp. 335 –349 (London: Springer, 2003).
19 Ling, R., Yttri, B., Anderson, B. and Diduca, D., 2002, Age, gender and social capital- a cross sectional analysis. Available at: www.eurescom.de/e-living/ (accessed August 2006).
20 Mackenzie, S., Zhang, S.X. and Soukoreff, R.W., 1999, Text entry using soft keyboards. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, pp. 235–244.
21 Mackenzie, S.I., 2002, Mobile Text Entry Using Three Keys. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- NordiCHI 2002, pp. 27–34.
22 Maragoudakis, M., Tselios, N.K., Fakotakis, N. and Avouris, N.M., 2002, Improving SMS Usability Using Bayesian Networks. In Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vlahavas, I.P. and Spyropoulos, C.D. (Eds), pp. 179–190 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002).
23 Nicolay, C.W. and Walker, A,L., 2005, Grip Strength and Endurance: Influence of Anthropometric Variation, Hand Dominance and Gender. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, pp. 605–618.
24 Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E. and Thorbjornsen, H., 2005, Explaining Intention to use Mobile Chat Services: Moderating Effects of Gender. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, pp. 247–256.
25 Pew-Internet, 2001, Wired Seniors: A Fervent Few, Inspired by Family Ties. Available at: www.perinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Wired_Seniors_Report.pdf (accessed July 2006)
26 Reid, D.J. and Reid F.J.M., 2003, Text mates and text circles: insights into the social ecology of SMS text messaging. In The Mobile Revolution: A Retrospective-Lesson on Social Shaping, Lasen, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Wireless World Conference.
27 Reid, F.J.M. and Reid, D.J., 2004, Text Appeal: The Psychology of SMS Texting and Its Implications for the Design of Mobile Phone Interfaces. Campus Wide Information Systems, 21, pp. 196–200.
28 Rosenthal, C., 1985, Kinkeeping in the Familial Division of Labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, pp. 965–974.
29 Sattle, J.W., 1985, The Inexpressive Male: Tragedy or Sexual Politics. Social Problems, 23, pp. 469–477.
30 Silfverberg, M., Mackenzie, S.I. and Korhonen, P., 2000, Predicting Text Entry Speed on Mobile Phones. CHI 2000, 2, pp. 9–16.
31 Sinclair, A.M., 1995, Subjective Assessment. In Evaluation of Human Work-A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, Wilson, J.R. and Corlett, E.N. (Eds.), pp. 69–100 (London:Taylor & Francis, 1995).
32 Soh, N., 2001, First Case of Sacking Via SMS. Available at: www.it.asia1.com.sg/newsarchive/07/news004_20010724.html (accessed August 2006).
33 Soriano, C., Raikundalia, G.K. and Szajman, J., 2005, A Usability Study of Short Message Service on Middle-Aged Users. In Proceedings of OZCHI 2005, Canberra, Australia.
34 Upside Wireless Text Messaging, 2006, 2006: Year of the Text Message?. Available at: www.upsidewireless.com/blog/2006/2006-year-of-the-text-message/ (accessed December 2006).
35 US Department of Commerce, 2002, A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Availbale at: www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/html/Chapter2.htm (accessed June 2006).
36 Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G., 2000, “Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions: gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”. MIS Quarterly, 24, pp. 115–39.
37 Wigdor, D. and Balakrishnan, R., 2003, TiltText: Using Tilt for Text Input to Mobile Phones. CHI Letters, 5, pp. 81–89.
38 Wigdor, D. and Balakrishnan, R., 2004, A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text Entry Techniques for Mobile Phones. CHI 2004, 6, pp. 81–88.
39 Wolin, L.D., 2003, Gender Issues in Advertising – An Oversight 2002. Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 111–129.
40 Wright, P., Bartram, C., Rogers, N., Emslie, H., Evans, J., Wilson, B. and Belt, S., 2000, Text entry on handheld computers by older users, Ergonomics, 43, pp. 702–716.
 
 
 
1 N. Daniel. “An Exploratory Study of Different Perception on The Usage of Text Message Lingo Among Male and Female College Students”, Presented at 2010 China Communication Forum, pp. 37-49., 10-12, Dec. 2010
2 W. Lane and C. Manner, “The Impact of Personality Traits on Smartphone Ownership and Use”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17), pp.. 22-28, 2011.
3 V. B. Paul and H.P. Yeow, “Hand-Size Variations Effect on Mobile Phone Texting Satisfaction”, Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, 2 (5), pp. 115-122, 2007.
4 Kawas, S. Al, (2011), “Textisms. (c2011)”.
 
 
 
1 CHAPTER PDF
 
2 searchuu.com
 
3 Share PDF
 
4 generalblog
 
5 Ebook Free Today
 
6 pipl
 
7 shendusou.com
 
8 ebookpp.com
 
9 USHOTSEARCHES
 
10 edu-doc.com
 
11 Printfu
 
12 PDF-MORE
 
 
 
Vimala Balakrishnan : Colleagues
Paul H. P. Yeow : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.