| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Performance Variation of LMS And Its Different Variants
|
|
Full
text: |
 PDF(153KB) |
|
|
Source |
International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS) |
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
Download
Complete Issue PDF(2.37MB) |
|
Volume: 4 Issue: 5 |
| |
Pages: 436-496 |
|
Publication
Date: December 2010 |
|
ISSN
(Online): 1985-1553 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages |
491 - 496 |
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
Published
Date |
20-12-2010 |
|
Publisher |
CSC
Journals, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia |
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION |
| Keywords Abstract References Cited by Related Articles Collaborative
Colleague |
| |
|
| |
KEYWORDS: Adaptive, lms, step size, PERFORMANCE, DIIFFERENT VARIANTS, CONVERGANCE |
|
|
| |
|
|
| This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:- |
|
| 1. refSeek |
| 2. Socol@r |
| 3. iSEEK |
| 4. PDFCAST |
| 5. Docstoc |
| 6. Google Scholar |
| 7. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
| 8. Scribd |
| 9. Academic Journals Database |
| 10. ResearchGATE |
| 11. Libsearch |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Acoustic echo cancellation is an essential and important requirement for various applications such as, telecasting, hands-free telephony and video-conferencing. Echo cancellers are required because of loud-speaker signals are picked up by a microphone and are fed back to the correspondent, resulting in an undesired echo. These days, adaptive filtering methods are used to cancel the affect of these echoes. Different variants of LMS adaptive algorithms have been. Implemented and they are compared based upon their performance according to the choice of step size |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1 |
Haykin, S “Adaptive Filter Theory”, Englewood Cliffs,N.J., Prentice,Hall, 1991.
|
|
|
| 2 |
Sondhi, M. M., Berkley, D.A. “Silencing Echoes on theTelephone Network”, Proc. IEEE, 68(8): 948,963.,August1980,
|
|
|
| 3 |
Sondhi, M. M., Mitra, D. “New Results on thePerformance of a Well9Known Class of Adaptive filter”,IEEE, 1976, 64(11):1583,1597
|
|
|
| 4 |
Brehm, H., Stammler, W. “Description and generation of spherically invariant speech9model signals”, Signal Processing 12(2):119–141, March 1987.
|
|
|
| 5 |
Moon, T. K., Stirling, W. C. “Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing”, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000.
|
|
|
| 6 |
Farhang,Boronjeny, B. “Adaptive Filters Theory and Application”, New York: Wiley, 2000.
|
|
|
| 7 |
Widrow, B., Stearns, S.D. “ Adaptive Signal Processing” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice. Hall, 2001.
|
|
|
| 8 |
Mader.A., Puder, H., Schmidt, G.U. “Step9size control For acoustic cancellation filters, Signal Process”. 80:1697–1719, 2000.
|
|
|
| 9 |
Ben Jebara, S., Besbes, H. “A variable step size filtered sign algorithm for acoustic echo cancellation”, IEEEvol. 39(12):936,938, June 2003.
|
|
|
| 10 |
Sophocles J. Orfanidis. “Optimum Signal processing An Introduction”, McGraw hill 1988.
|
|
|
| 11 |
Proakis, J.G., Melonakos, D.G. “Digital Signal Processing Principles, Algorithms and Applications”, Prentice Hall,1996.
|
|
|
| 12 |
Brennan, R., Schneider. “ A flexible filter bank Structure for extensive signal manipulation in digital Hearing aids”,Proc.IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, pp. 569,572,1998.
|
|
|
| 13 |
Vaseghi,S.“Theory and Application in Speech, Music and Communications”,”Wiley2007.
|
|
|
| 14 |
Benesty,J.,Morgan, D. R..Sondhi,,M. M. “A Hybrid Mono/Stereo Acoustic Echo Canceller”, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing.1997.
|
|
|
| 15 |
Ehtiati, Benoît Champagne,B. “Constrained Adaptive Echo Cancellation for Discrete Multitone Systems”, IEEE transactions on signal processing, 57(1),JANUARY2009
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1 |
NIT Kurukshetra
|
| 2 |
imarksweb.net
|
| 3 |
peekyou
|
| 4 |
123people
|
| 5 |
2dix.com
|
| 6 |
edu-doc
|
| 7 |
docslibrary.com
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| Sanjeev Kumar Dhull : Colleagues
|
|
| DR .O. P SAHU : Colleagues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
