List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
A New Paradigm in User Equilibrium-Application in Managed Lane Pricing
Full text
 PDF(1.24MB)
Source 
International Journal of Engineering (IJE)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(9.49MB)
Volume:  5    Issue:  1
Pages:  1-175
Publication Date:   March / April 2011
ISSN (Online): 1985-2312
Pages 
73 - 101
Author(s)  
Asapol Sinprasertkool - United States of Ame
Siamak Ardekani - United States of Ame
Stephen P. Mattingly - United States of Ame
 
Published Date   
04-04-2011 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   Managed Lanes, User Equilibrium, Pricing Policy 
 
 
This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:-
1. Scribd
2. refSeek
3. Socol@r
4. Google Scholar
5. iSEEK
6. Docstoc
7. WorldCat
 
 
Ineffective use of the High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) lanes has the potential to decrease the overall roadway throughput during peak periods. Excess capacity in HOV lanes during peak periods can be made available to other types of vehicles, including single occupancy vehicles (SOV) for a price (toll). Such dual use lanes are known as “Managed Lanes.” The main purpose of this research is to propose a new paradigm in user equilibrium to predict the travel demand for determining the optimal fare policy for managed lane facilities. Depending on their value of time, motorists may choose to travel on Managed Lanes (ML) or General Purpose Lanes (GPL). In this study, the features in the software called Toll Pricing Modeler version 4.3 (TPM-4.3) are described. TPM-4.3 is developed based on this new user equilibrium concept and utilizes it to examine various operating scenarios. The software has two built-in operating objective options: 1) what would the ML operating speed be for a specified SOV toll, or 2) what should the SOV toll be for a desired minimum ML operating speed. A number of pricing policy scenarios are developed and examined on the proposed managed lane segment on Interstate 30 (I-30) in Grand Prairie, Texas. The software provides quantitative estimates of various factors including toll revenue, emissions and system performance such as person movement and traffic speed on managed and general purpose lanes. Overall, among the scenarios examined, higher toll rates tend to generate higher toll revenues, reduce overall CO and NOx emissions, and shift demand to general purpose lanes. On the other hand, HOV preferential treatments at any given toll level tend to reduce toll revenue, have no impact on or reduce system performance on managed lanes, and increase CO and NOx emissions.  
 
 
 
1 S. A. Ardekani, F. Kashefi, K. Abdelghany, and A. Hassan. “User Guide to Toll Pricing Model v3.1: TPM-3.1”. 2007
2 J. T. Berg, K. Kawada, M. Burris, C. Swenson, L. Smith and E. Sullivan. “Value Pricing Pilot Program”. TR News 204, pp. 3-10, 1999
3 D. Brownstone, A. Ghosh, T. F. Golob, C. Kazimi and D. V. Amelsfort. “Drivers’ Willingnessto- Pay to Reduce Travel Time: Evidence from the San Diego 1-15 Congestion Pricing Project”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 373-387, May 2003
4 M. W. Burris, M. C. Pietrzyk and C. R. Swenson. “Observed Traffic Pattern Changes Due to the Introduction of Variable Tolls”. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000
5 M. W. Burris and E. Sullivan. “Benefit-Cost Analysis of Variable Pricing Projects: QuickRide HOT Lanes”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, pp. 183- 190, March 2006
6 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. “I-394 MNPASS Technical Evaluation: Final Report”. Project report to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota, 2006
7 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and URS Corporation. “MNPASS System Study: Final Report”. Project report to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota, 2005
8 J. S. Drake, J. L. Schofer and A. D. May. “A Statistical Analysis of Speed Density Hypotheses”. Highway Research Record, Vol. 154, Highway Research Board, NRC, Washington, 1967
9 Federal Highway Administration “Managed Lanes: A Primer”. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008
10 G. Fielding and D. Klein. “High Occupancy/Toll Lanes: Phasing in Congestion Pricing a Lane at a Time”. Policy Study No. 170, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, 1993
11 J. D. Fricker and R. K. Whitford. “Fundamentals of Transportation Engineering: A Multimodal Systems Approach”. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004
12 D. G. Goodin, M. W. Burris, C. M. Dusza, D. H. Ungemah, J. Li, S. A. Ardakani and S. P. Mattingly. “Role of Preferential Treatment of Carpools in Managed Lane Facilities”. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, Project Summary Report 0-5286-2, 2009
13 B. Greenshields. “A Study of Traffic Capacity”. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board, Highway Research Board, Washington D.C., Vol. 14, pp. 468-477, 1933
14 M. E. Gross and M. J. Garvin. “Approaches for Structuring Concession Lengths and Toll Rates for Transportation Infrastructure PPPs”. Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, pp. 191-200, 2009
15 R. He, B. Ran, K. Choi and A. L. Kornhauser. “Evaluation of Value Pricing Using a Multiclass Dynamic Network Model”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, pp. 617-624, November/December 2003
16 M. Hickman, Q. Brown and A. Miranda. “An Evaluation of the Demand for the Katy Freeway HOV lane Value Pricing Project”. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000
17 D. H. Kang and W. Stockton. “Estimation of Toll Road Users Value of Time”. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, Report No. SWUTC/08/473700-00084-1, 2008
18 B. Kuhn, G. Goodin, A. Ballard, M. Brewer, R. Brydia, J. Carson, S. Chrysler, T. Collier, K. Fitzpatrick, D. Jasek, C. Toycen and G. Ullman. “Managed Lanes Handbook”. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, 2005
19 J. Li, S. Govind, J. C. Williams, S. A. Ardekani and C. R. Richard. “Assessing Pricing Strategies and Users’ Attitudes Towards Managed Lanes: Executive Summary”. Project Summary Report 4009-S, 2002
20 S. P. Mattingly, A. Upayokin and J. Li. “A Driver’s Dilemma: Main Lane or HOT Lane”. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Decision Making in Urban and Civil Engineering, 2004
21 NCTCOG. “Managed Lanes: Improved Mobility Through Choice”. North Central Texas Council of Governments, 2009
22 S. M. Nepal. “Traffic Flow Models for Freeway Traffic Operation”. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas, 2008
23 Parsons Brinckerhoff “Regional toll revenue feasibility study”. Working draft prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation Urban Corridors Office, 2002
24 G. Ragazzi. “Tolls and Project Financing: a Critical View”. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 15(1), pp. 41-53, 2005
25 C. Sharp, K. Button and D. Deadman. “The Economics of Tolled Road Crossings”. Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy, Vol. 20(2), pp. 255-274. 1986
26 E. Sullivan. “Continuation Study to Evaluate the Impacts of the SR91 Value-Priced Express Lanes: Final Report”. Project report to the California Department of Transportation, Traffic Operation Program, HOV System Branch, Sacramento, CA, 2000
27 J. Supernak, J. M. Golob, K. Kawada and T. F. Goob. “San Diego’s I-15 Congestion Pricing Project – Preliminary Findings”. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999
28 M. Swisher, W. L. Eisele, D. Ungemah and G. D. Goodin. “Life-Cycle Graphical Representation of Managed HOV Lane Evolution”. Submitted for the 11th International HOV conference, Seattle, Washington, October 2002
29 USEPA (2009). “MOBILE6 Vehicle Emission Modeling Software”. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Website available at: http://www.epa.gov/OMS/m6.htm. [Accessed: November 29, 2009]
30 USEPA (2009). “Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES)”. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Website available at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm. [Accessed: November 29, 2009]
31 J. G. Wardrop. “Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part II, Vol. I, pp. 325-362, 1952
32 WSA. “Level 2 Traffic and Toll Revenue Study: IH 30 Reversible Managed Lanes- June 2007”. Wilbur Smith Associates, 2007
33 A. Yerramalla. “Vehicular Emissions Models Using MOBILE6.2 and Field Data”. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas, 2007
34 Y. Yin and Y. Lou. “Dynamic Tolling Strategies for Managed Lanes”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 2, pp. 45-52, 2009
35 FTP of Unixbench Viewed on 13th Mar 2010.
36 Daniel P. Bovet & Macro Cesati. “Understanding the Linux Kernel”. O’REILLY Press, Nov 2005.
37 Floating Point Unit, , From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia. Viewed on 24th Mar 2010
38 Comparing Linux and Minix, , LWN.net article, Viewed on 16th May 2010.
39 Hbench-OS Operating system Benchmarks , Viewed on 16th May 2010.
40 H. Hartig, M. Hohmuth, J. Liedtke, S. Schänberg, J. Wolter, “The Performance of ?-Kernel-based Systems”, 16th SOSP TU Dresden, Fakultat Informatik, Heft Jan 1997.
41 Ben Leslie, Carl van Schaik and Gernot Heiser, “Wombat: a portable user-mode Linux for embedded systems”, Proceedings of the 6th Linux Conference Australia, Canberra, April, 2005.
42 ERTOS Website , National ICT Australia United, Viewed on 16th May 2010.
43 Release Notes of MINIX 3.1.3 - Developer's Interim Release, , Minix3 Home Website, Viewed on 17th May 2010.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asapol Sinprasertkool : Colleagues
Siamak Ardekani : Colleagues
Stephen P. Mattingly : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.