List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
Attitude Formation of Benefits Satisfaction: Knowledge and Fit of Benefits
Full text
 PDF(67.9KB)
Source 
International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(1.05MB)
Volume:  2    Issue:  1
Pages:  1-52
Publication Date:   March / April 2011
ISSN (Online): 2180-2165
Pages 
45 - 52
Author(s)  
Gery Markova - United States of Ame
Foard Jones - United States of America
 
Published Date   
04-04-2011 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   Benefits, Benefits Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions 
 
 
This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:-
1. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
2. Scribd
3. Docstoc
4. Google Scholar
 
 
Using the theoretical framework of the Theory of Reasoned Action [6], we examine benefits satisfaction as an attitude formed by the beliefs about benefits (i.e., benefits knowledge) and the perceived value of these benefits (i.e., fit of benefits to individual needs). We use questionnaires to gather data from a random sample of 591 employees in a large county agency in the South-eastern United States. The data support that knowledge of benefits is associated with enhanced benefits satisfaction and mediates the effect of explanations about benefits on satisfaction. The results provide strong evidence that benefits perceived to suit employee needs generate highest benefits satisfaction. Employees satisfied with their benefits are less likely to consider leaving the organization. The tested model is a starting point for future studies to apply the extended Theory of Reasoned Action [1] and incorporate perceived behavioural control and subjective norms (i.e., co-workers’ attitudes) in forming benefits satisfaction. Understanding employees’ affective and cognitive reactions to compensation, including benefits, can render better practices. Companies should use information campaigns to improve employee beliefs about benefits. Better attentiveness to individual needs and preferences can maximize the utility of a benefits plan and improve its acceptance. We replicate and extend past research in a parsimonious model of benefits satisfaction with a random sample of public sector employees.  
 
 
 
1 Ajzen. “The theory of planned behaviour”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211, 1991
2 H. Heneman III, D. Schwab. “Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement”. International Journal of Psychology, 20(2): 129-141, 1985
3 M. Williams, S. Malos and D. Palmer. “Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences”. Journal of Management, 28(2): 195-21522. 2002
4 M. Miceli, M. Lane. “Antecedents of pay satisfaction: A review and extension”. In K. Rowland and G.R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, 9: 235-309, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. (1991)
5 C. Danehower, J. A. Lust. “A conceptual model of the determinants of employee benefit satisfaction”. Human Resource Management Review, 2(3): 221-238, 2001
6 M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen. “Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. (1975)
7 M. L. Williams. “Antecedents of Employee Benefit Level Satisfaction: A Test of a Model”. Journal of Management, 21(6): 1097-1129, 1995
8 B.R. Rabin. “Benefits communication: its impact on employee benefits satisfaction under flexible programs”. Benefits Quarterly, 10(4): 67-83, 1994
9 A. Barber, R.B. Dunham and R.A. Formisano. “The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study”. Personnel Psychology, 45(1): 55-75, 1992
10 C. Danehower, J. A. Lust. “How aware are employees of their benefits?: Findings from two companies”. Benefits Quarterly, 12(4): 57-61, 1996
11 H. W. Hennessey, P.L. Perrewe and W.A. Hochwarter. “Impact of benefit awareness on employee and organizational outcomes: A longitudinal field examination”. Benefits Quarterly, 8(2): 90-98, 1992
12 F. Dreher, R. Ash and R. Bretz. “Benefit coverage and employee cost: Critical factors in explaining compensation satisfaction”. Personnel Psychology, 41(2): 237-254, 1988
13 C. Danehower, K. Celuch and J. Lust. “Benefits management and communication: A marketing orientation”. Human Resource Management Review, 4(2): 177-195, 1994
14 E.L. Harvell, J.A. Lust. “Personalized benefit communication: An application to retirement savings plans”. Benefits Quarterly, 11(3): 56-62, 1995
15 J. Haar, S. Kossack, “Employee benefit packages: How understandable are they?”. The Journal of Business Communication, 27(2): 185-200, 1990
16 M. Barringer, G.Milkovich. “Employee health insurance decisions in a flexible benefits environment”. Human Resources Management Journal, 35(3): 293-316, 1996
17 R. Kearney, C. Sears. “Planning fringe benefits for the work force of the future”. Public Administration Quarterly, 9(3): 291-310, 1985
18 A. Brief, J. Atieh. “Studying job stress: Are we making mountains out of molehills?”. Journal of occupational behavior, 8(2): 115-126. 1987
19 V. Scarpello, F. Jones. “Why justice matter in compensation decision making”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 285-289, 1996
20 M. Tremblay, B. Sire and D. Balkin. “The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefits satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes”. Group and Organizational Management, 25(3): 269-290, 2000
21 K. Aquino, R. Griffeth, D. Allen and P. Hom. “Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model”. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5): 1208-1227, 1997
22 P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y.Lee and N. P. Podsakoff. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-904, 2003
23 R. M. Baron, D. A. Kenny. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182, 1986
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gery Markova : Colleagues
Foard Jones : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.