List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
Selection of the Best Module Design for Ultrafiltration (UF) Membrane in Dairy Industry: An Application of AHP and PROMETHEE
Full text
 PDF(499.8KB)
Source 
International Journal of Engineering (IJE)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(2.82MB)
Volume:  3    Issue:  5
Pages:  413-520
Publication Date:   November 2009
ISSN (Online): 1985-2312
Pages 
426 - 442
Author(s)  
 
Published Date   
30-11-2009 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   membrane separation, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), PROMETHEE 
 
 
This Manuscript is indexed in the following databases/websites:-
1. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
2. OpenJ-Gate
3. Docstoc
4. Scribd
5. PDFCAST
6. Google Scholar
7. WorldCat
8. CiteSeerX
9. ScientificCommons
10. Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)
11. ResearchGATE
12. refSeek
13. Academic Index
14. iSEEK
15. Socol@r
16. Academic Journals Database
17. Libsearch
18. slideshare
19. Chinese Directory Of Open Access
 
 
Membrane with a type module has been expressed one of the key area of interest in dairy industry. Although recent publications have given a chance academics and practitioners to prove successful applications of membrane processes to the vast areas; a small number of publications have been devoted attention to the problem of capital equipment decision-making. To facilitate decision-making process in the membrane separation, this report focuses on the application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), from a group decision-making viewpoint; it uses the Delphi technique to evaluate available alternatives according the criteria elicited from expert's opinions. A real case study on the ultrafiltration membrane area is put forward to determine the best module design based on the five criteria expressed by decision-makers: sanitation design, clean–in-place, packing density, resistance to fouling and shear stress, and relative cost. Finally, the paper utilizes Expert Choice and DECISION LAB software’s to facilitate calculations. 
 
 
 
1 J.Wagner. “Membrane Filtration Handbook Practical Tips and Hints“. Second Edition, Revision 2 (2001)
2 2. B.Jiao, A.Cassano, E. Drioli. “Recent Advances on Membrane Processes for the Concentration of Fruit Juices: A Review“. Journal of Food Engineering, 63: 303-324, 2004
3 S.S.Madaeni, S.Zereshki. “Membrane Technology as a Promising Alternative for Less Energy Consumption in Food Industry“. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Energy Research and Development (ICERD- 3), 2006
4 Oak Ridge National Laboratory. “ Materials for Separation Technologies: Energy and Emission Reduction Opportunities“. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S Department of Energy, Oak Ridge,TN 37830, (2005)
5 J.Schwinge, P.R.Neal, S.E.Wiley, D.F.Fltcher, A.G Fane . “Spiral Wound Modules and Spacers: Review and Analysis“. Journal of Membrane Science, 242: 129-153, 2004
6 S.Muthukumaran, S.E.Kenitish, M. Ashokkumar, G.W. Stevens. “Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration“. Journal of membrane science, 258: 106-114, 2005
7 P.Le-Clech. Z. Cao, P.Y.Wan, D.E.Wiley, A.G Fane. “The application of constant temperature anemometry to membrane processes“. Journal of membrane science, 284: 416-423, 2006
8 W.Eykamp. “Membrane Separation Processes in Perry’s Chemical Engineers Handbook“.7th (Eds), Mc Graw-Hill,NY.22.39-22.39-22.41(1997)
9 Cousins, R.B. “ Membrane Technology“. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering University of Strathclyde in Glasgow (2003-2004)
10 S. Ali, P.Boblak, E.Capili, S.Milidovich. “ Membrane Separation and Ultrafiltration“, CHE-396 Senior Design.,(1998).
11 L.Vargas. “ An overview of analytic hierarchy process: Its applications”, European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1) 2–8, 1990
12 D. H. Byun, “The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model“. Information & Management, 38: 289-297, 2001
13 M. T.Escobar, J.Aguaron, J. M. Moreno-Jimenes. “ A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure“. European Journal of Operational Research, 153: 318-322, 2004
14 V. S.Lai, B. K.Wong, W. Cheung. “Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection“. European Journal of Operational Research, 137: 134-144,2002
15 T.L. Saaty.” Decision making for leaders”. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications (1982)
16 M.Janic, A. Reggiani. “An Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Analysis to the Selection of a New Hub Airport“. EJTIR, 2(2): 113-14, 2002
17 T. L. Saaty. “ Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares”, European Journal of Operational Research 48: 156-160, 1990
18 T.L. Saaty. “Highlights and critical points in theory and application of the analytical hierarchy process“. European Journal of Operational Research, 74: 426-447, 1994a
19 T.L. Saaty. “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process“. Interfaces, 24: 19-43, 1994b
20 T.L. Saaty. “Modeling unstructured decision problems: a theory of analytical hierarchies“. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mathematical Modeling, St. Louis, Missouri, 69–77, 1977
21 T.L. Saaty. “ The Analytical Hierarchy Process“. Mc Graw-Hill. New York, (1980)
22 T.L. Saaty. “How to make a decision: the analytical hierarchy process“. European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland, 48: 9-26,1990a
23 K. M. Al-Subhi Al-harbi. “Application of the AHP in project management“. International Journal of Project Management, 19: 19-27, 2001
24 Z.Xu. “On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP“. European Journal of Operational Research, 126, 683-687, 2000
25 C.Macharis, A.Verbeke, K. De Brucker. ‘The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multi-criteria analysis: the advisors case’, in Bekiaris E. and Y. Nakanishi (eds.) Economic impacts of Intelligent Transport Systems. Innovations and case studies, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)
26 Z.Babic, N.Plazibat. “Ranking of enterprises based on multicriterial analysis“. International Journal of Production Economics, 29–35, 1998
27 R.U.Bilsel, G.Buyukozkan, D. Ruan. “A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites“. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 21: 1181–1197, 2006
28 J.J.Wang, D.L. Yang. “Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing“. Computers & Operations Research 34: 3691– 3700, 2007
29 J.P. Brans, P.Vincke. “A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM“. Management Science, 31: 641-656, 1985
30 J.P.Brans, B.Mareschal. “ PROMETHEE V–MCDM problems with segmentation constraints“. INFOR, 30(2): 85-96, 1992
31 M.K. Malhotra, D.C. Steele, V. Grover.“Important strategic and tactical manufacturing issues in the 1990s“. Decision Sciences, 25(2): 189-214, 1994
32 R.P.Hudak, Jr. P.P. Brooke, K. Finstuen. P.Riley. “Health care administration in the year 2000: practioners“. views of future issues and job requirements. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 38(2): 181-195, 1993
33 M.Tavana, D.T.Kennedy, P.Joglekar. “A group decision support framework for consensus ranking of technical manager candidates“. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24: 523-538. 1996
34 R. Bijl. “Delphi in a future scenario study on mental health and mental health care“. Futures, 24(3): 232-250, 1992
35 N.G.Hall, J.C.Hershey, L.G. Kessler, R.C. Stotts. “A model for making project funding decisions at the national cancer institute“. Operations Research, 40(6): 1040-1052, 1992
36 T.E Weinberger. “ The strategic centrality of jobs: a measure of value“. Compensation and Benefits Review, 24(1), 61-68, 1992
37 M.Tavana, D.T Kennedy. “ N-site: a distributed consensus building and negotiation support system“. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5(1): 123-154, 2006
38 F.Niederman, J.C. Brancheau, J.C Wetherbe. “Information systems management issues for the 1990s“. MIS Quarterly, 15(4): 474-500, 1991
39 Ch.Okoli, S. Pawlwoski . “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications“. Journal of Information and Management, 42: 15-29, 2004
40 Dalkey, C., Norman, L. R. Daniel, R.Lewis, D. Snyder,” Studies in the Quality of Life, Delphi and Decision-Making”, Lexington Books, PP. 20-21(1972)
41 K. Brockoff. “ Group process for forecasting“. European Journal of Operational Research, 13(2),115-127, 1983
42 J.F. Preble. “The selection of delphi panels for strategic planning purposes“. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 157-170, 1984
43 www.Expertchoice.com
44 M.Tavana, D.T. Kennedy, B. Mohebbi. “Total quality index: a benchmarking tool for total quality management“. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(6): 507-527, 2003
45 M.Tavana, D.T. Kennedy , B.Leauby, J. Ugras. “An investigation of the relative importance of the characteristics of information in governmental financial reporting“. Business Journal, 19(1-2), 56-62, 2004
46 P.T.Harker, L.G. Vargas. “ The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process“. Management Science, 33:1383-1403,1987
47 T.L. Saaty. “Axiomatic foundations of the analytic hierarchy process“. Management Science, 32: 841-855, 1983
48 J.S. Dyer. “ Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process“. Management Science, 36: 249-258, 1990a
49 T.L. Saaty. “An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process“. Management Science, 36: 259-268, 1990b
50 J.S. Dyer . “A clarification of Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process“. Management Science, 36: 274-275, 1990b
51 P.T. Harker, L.G. Vargas. “Reply to ‘remarks on the analytic hierarchy process by J.S. Dyer“. Management Science, 36, 269-273, 1990
52 Decision Lab 2000-Getting started Guide. “www.visualdecision.com” “Visual Decision Inc. Montreal, Canada (1999)
 
 
 
1 DR. S.K. AMPONSAH, MR K.F. DARKWAH and DR. S.K. AMPONSAH, “Optimal decision on five telecommunication networks in the Greater Accra Region using promethee.
2 Task Leader: Prof. Agis M. PAPADOPOULOS (Part I) Aristotle University Thessaloniki Dr. Popi KONIDARI (Part II) National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Greece, 2011, “Overview and selection of multi-criteria evaluation methods for mitigation/adaptation policy instruments”, PROMITHEAS–4.
 
 
 
1 docin
 
2 printfu
 
 
 
Mohsen Pirdashti : Colleagues
Majid Behzadian : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.