List of Journals    /    Call For Papers    /    Subscriptions    /    Login
 
 
 
 
 SEARCH
By Author By Title
 
 
ABOUT CSC
 About CSC Journals
 CSC Journals Objectives
 List of Journals
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 Call For Papers CFP
 Special Issue CFP
AUTHOR GUIDELINES
 Submission Guidelines
 Peer Review Process
 Helpful Hints For Getting Published
 Plagiarism Policies
 Abstracting & Indexing
 Open Access Policy
 Submit Manuscript
 FOR REVIEWERS
 Reviewer Guidelines
 FOR EDITORIAL
 Editor Guidelines
 Join Us As Editor
 Launch Special Issue
 Suggest New Journal
 CSC LIBRARY
 Browse CSC Library
 Open Access Policy
  SERVICES
 Conference Partnership Program (CPP)
 Abstracting & Indexing
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 Subscriptions
 Discounted Packages
 Archival Subscriptions
 How to Subscribe
 Librarians
 Subscriptions Agents
 Order Form
 DOWNLOADS
 
 
 
 
Dual-Diameter Variation –Immune CNFET-based 7T SRAM Cell
Full text
 PDF(226.1KB)
Source 
Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An International Journal (NIJ)
Table of Contents
Download Complete Issue    PDF(530.31KB)
Volume:  1    Issue:  1
Pages:  NULL
Publication Date:   July / August 2011
ISSN (Online): 2180-1304
Pages 
1 - 14
Author(s)  
Aminul Islam - India
Mohd. Hasan - India
 
Published Date   
08-02-2011 
Publisher 
CSC Journals, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Keywords   Abstract   References   Cited by   Related Articles   Collaborative Colleague
 
KEYWORDS:   Namoelectronics, Nanotechnology, Nanotubes 
 
 
No record found
 
 
This paper proposes a variation – tolerant dual-diameter CNFET-based 7T (seven transistor) SRAM (static random access memory) cell. The use of appropriate DCNT (diameter of CNFET) and hence Vt of CNFETs is a critical piece of our design strategy. In this work, dual-Vt and dual-diameter CNFETs have been used using suitable chiral vectors for appropriate transistors. It also investigates the impact of process, voltage and temperature variations on its design metrics and compares the results with its counterpart − CMOS-based 7T SRAM cell and standard 6T SRAM cell (only few parameters). The proposed SRAM cell offers 1.35× and 1.25× improvement in standby power on an average @ VDD = 1 V and 0.9 V respectively, 30% improvement in SNM (Static Noise Margin) over CMOS-based 7T cell. Proposed design outperforms 6T in terms of 71.4% improvement in RSNM and shows same read stability as its CMOS counterpart, It shows its robustness by offering 1.4× less spread in TRA (read access time) at 1 V and 1.2× less spread in TRA at 0.9 V than that of its CMOS counterpart at the expense of 1.6× read delay. The proposed bitcell also exhibits higher performance while writing (takes 1.3× and 1.2× less TWA (write access time) @ VDD = 1 V and VDD= 0.9 V respectively). It also proves its robustness against process variations by featuring tighter spread in TWA variability (1.4× and 1.2× @ VDD= 1 V and 0.9 V respectively). 
 
 
 
1 D. Burnett, K. Erington, C. Subramanian, and K. Baker. “Implications of fundamental threshold voltage variations for high-density SRAM and logic circuits”. In Proceedings of the Symp. VLSI Tech., 15–16, 1994.
2 S. Rusu, S. Tam, H. Muljono, D. Ayers, J. Chang, B. Cherkauer, J. Stinson, J. Benoit, R. Varada, J. Leung, et al. “A 65-nm Dual-Core Multithreaded Xeon Processor With 16-MB L3 Cache”. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 42(1): 17-25, 2007.
3 A. Naeemi, R. Sarvari, and J. D. Meindl. “Performance comparison between carbon nanotube and copper interconnects for gigascale integration (GSI)”. IEEE Electron Device Lett., 26(2): 84–86, 2005.
4 N. Srivastava and K. Banerjee. “A comparative scaling analysis of metallic and carbon nanotube interconnections for nanometer scale VLSI technologies”. In Proceedings of the 21st International VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (VMIC ’04). 393–398, 2004.
5 A. Raychowdhury and K. Roy. “Modeling of metallic carbonnanotube interconnects for circuit simulations and a comparison with Cu interconnects for scaled technologies”. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Syst., 25(1):58–65, 2006.
6 A. Raychowdhury and K. Roy. “A circuit model for carbon nanotube interconnects: comparative study with Cu interconnects for scaled technologies”. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD ’04), 237–240, 2004.
7 P. McEuen, M. Fuhrer, and H. Park, “Single-walled carbon nanotube electronics”. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 1(1):pp. 78–85, 2002.
8 H. J. Li, W. G. Lu, J. J. Li, X. D. Bai, and C. Z. Gu, “Multichannel ballistic transport in multiwall carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, 95(8), Article ID 086601, 4 pages, 2005.
9 A. Javey, J. Guo, D. B. Farmer, Q. Wang, E. Yenilmez, R. G. Gordon, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai. “Self-aligned ballistic molecular transistors and electrically parallel nanotube arrays”. Nano Lett., 4(7):1319–1322, 2004.
10 Z. Yao, C. L. Kane, and C. Dekker. “High-field electrical transport in single-wall carbon nanotubes”. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84(13):2941– 2944, 2000.
11 A. Javey, J. Guo, D. B. Farmer, Q. Wang, D. Wang, R. G. Gordon, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai. “Carbon nanotube field-effect transistors with integrated ohmic contacts and high-k gate dielectrics”. Nano Lett., 4(3):447–450, 2004.
12 D. Mann, A. Javey, J. Kong, Q. Wang, and H. Dai. “Ballistic transport in metallic nanotubes with reliable Pd ohmic contacts”. Nano Lett., 3(11):1541–1544, 2003.
13 Y. Cui, Z. Zhong, D. Wang, W. U. Wang, and C. M. Lieber. “High performance silicon nanowire field effect transistors”. Nano Lett., 3(2):149–152, 2003.
14 Stanford University CNFETModelWeb site. (2008). [Online]. Available: http://nano.stanford.edu/model.php?id=23
15 J. Deng, H.-S. P. Wong. “A Compact SPICE Model for Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors Including Nonidealities and Its Application - Part I: Model of the Intrinsic Channel Region”. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 54(12):3186-3194, 2007
16 J. Deng, H.-S. P. Wong. “A Compact SPICE Model for Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors Including Nonidealities and Its Application - Part II: Full Device Model and Circuit Performance Benchmarking”. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 54(12):3195-3205, 2007.
17 H. Qin, Y. Cao, D. Markovic, A. Vladimirescu, and J. Rabaey. “SRAM leakage suppression by minimizing standby supply voltage”. In Proceedings of the Int. Symp. Quality Electron. Des., 55-60, 2004.
18 R. Aly, M. Faisal, and A. Bayoumi. “Novel 7T SRAM cell for low power cache design”. In Proceedings of the IEEE SOC Conf., 171–174, 2005.
19 J. Zhang, et at.. “Carbon nanotube correlation: promising opportunity for CNFET circuit yield enhancement”. In Proceedins of the DAC 2010, Anatheim, California, USA, 889-892, 2010.
20 orkar, S., et al. “Statistical circuit design with carbon nanotubes”. U.S. Patent Application 20070155065, 2005.
21 H. Dai. “Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, integration, and properties”. Acc. Chem. Res. 35(12):1035-1044, 2002.
22 N. Hamada, S.-I. Sawada, and A. Oshiyama. “New one-dimensional conductors: graphite microtubules.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 68(10):1579–1581, 1992.
23 Y. Li, et al. “Preferential growth of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes by a plasma enhanced CVD method”. Nano Letters, 4(2):317-321, 2004.
24 L. Ding, et al. “Selective growth of well-aligned semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes”. Nano Letters, 9(2):800-805, 2009.
25 M. LeMieux, et al. “Self-sorted, aligned nanotube networks for thin-film transistors”. Science, 321(5885):101-104, 2008.
26 M. Engel, et al. “Thin film nanotube transistors based on self-assembled, aligned, semiconducting carbon nanotube arrays”. ACS Nano, 2(12):2445-2452, 2008.
27 J. Zhang, N. Patil and S. Mitra. “Probabilistic analysis and design of metallic-carbonnanotube- tolerant digital logic circuits”. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Syst, 28(9):1307-1320, 2009.
28 G. Zhang, et al. “Selective etching of metallic carbon nanotubes by gas-phase reaction”. Science, 314(5801):974-977, 2006.
29 P. G. Collins, M. S. Arnold and P. Avouris. “Engineering carbon nanotubes and nanotube circuits using electrical breakdown”. Science, 292:706-709, 2001.
30 A. Lin, et al. “Threshold voltage and on-off ratio tuning for multiple-tube carbon nanotube FETs”. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 8(1):4-9, 2009.
31 N. Patil, Albert Lin, Jie Zhang, Hai Wei, Kyle Anderson H. -S. Philip Wong and Subhasish Mitra. “Scalable carbon nanotube computational and storage circuits immune to metallic and mis-positioned carbon nanotubes”. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 99, 2010.
32 N. Patil, et al.. “Design methods for misaligned and mis-positioned carbon-nanotube-immune circuits”. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Syst. 27(10):1725-1736, 2008.
33 D. Akinwande, et al. “Monolithic integration of CMOS VLSI and carbon nanotubes for hybrid nanotechnology application”. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 7(5):636-639, 2008.
34 Berkeley Predictive Technology Model, UC Berkeley Device Group. [Online]. Available: http://www-device.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ptm/.
35 I. Amlani, J. Lewis, K. Lee, R. Zhang, J. Deng, and H.-S. P. Wong. “First demonstration of AC gain from a single-walled carbon nanotube common-source amplifier”. In Proceedings of the Int. Electron Devices Meet., 1-4, 2006.
36 K. Roy, S. Mukhopadhyay, and H. Mahmoodi-Meimand. “Leakage current mechanisms and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits”. In Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(2):305–327, 2003.
37 B. H. Calhoun, and Anantha P. Chandrakasan. “Static Noise Margin Variation for Subthreshold SRAM in 65-nm CMOS”. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, 42(7), 2006.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aminul Islam : Colleagues
Mohd. Hasan : Colleagues  
 
 
 
  Untitled Document
 
Copyrights (c) 2012 Computer Science Journals. All rights reserved.
Best viewed at 1152 x 864 resolution. Microsoft Internet Explorer.
 
  
 
Copyrights & Usage: Articles published by CSC Journals are Open Access. Permission to copy and distribute any other content, images, animation and other parts of this website is prohibited. CSC Journals has the rights to take action against individual/group if they are found victim of copying these parts of the website.