Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
Reflecting upon Management Systems: Content analysis and synthesis
Manuel F. Suárez-Bar , Juan Ramis-Pujol, Miguel Ángel Heras
Pages - 64 - 86     |    Revised - 30-11-2010     |    Published - 20-12-2010
Volume - 1   Issue - 2    |    Publication Date - December 2010  Table of Contents
Management System, Models and Frameworks, Best Practice
The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss/reflect on son well-known quality, strategy and excellence frameworks or models in order to understand the development of the management systems from the classical theory to now. In addition we try to understand the problems or limitation which such kind of models still may have, and in that sense, we proposed a possible macro elements and characteristics of an integral Management System. The studies examine some leading quality, strategy, excellence frameworks or models and discuss/identify their strengths as well as weakness. The chosen models and frameworks are Taylor’s principles (1911), Fayol’s operations (1914), System theory-frameworks (1969), Peter’s and Waterman’s eight excellence attributes (1982), the EFQM European Excellence model (1992), list of best practices (1998), the ISO 9000 norms (2000), Toyota’s 4P model, and Kaplan and Norton’s Management System (2008). Generally, quality, strategy and excellence models and frameworks are inspired by the classical management theory and/or Japanese practices and they recognize the importance to manage any organization using a Management System, which can be integrated by a hard and soft dimensions. Any dimension it is integrated by some elements and some characteristics. Therefore, as a result we attempt to make a first possible description of an integral Management System. On the other hand, our findings indicate that there are tendencies to interpret these models from positivistic view and ignore the soft dimension of the Management System (human aspect), when organization try to implement the model in their struggle to achieve quality and/or excellence, and when they try to translate the strategy in an effective process operation. An integral and holistic Management System can reduce these negative tendencies. The paper aspires to be of interest as much to researchers as to professionals in the manufacturing and service industry, whether they have middle management responsibilities, or are general managers, and also to all those employees whose work is related to some positions of authority (managing people and resources), with the object of understanding the Management System as an integral and holistic view that any organization uses to develop its strategy and translate into operational action and monitor and improve the effectiveness of both.
CITED BY (1)  
1 Jaca, C., Viles, E., Paipa-Galeano, L., Santos, J., & Mateo, R. (2014). Learning 5S principles from Japanese best practitioners: case studies of five manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4574-4586.
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 Scribd 
4 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
1 G. Morgan. “Images of Organizations”, Sage, London (1986)
2 G. Hamel. “Moon Shots for Management”, Harvard Business Review, 87(2):92, 2009a
3 K. Kaizer, S. D. Young. “Need cash: look insider your company”, Harvard Business Review,87(5):64-71, 2009
4 H. Koontz. “The management theory jungle”, Journal of the Academy of Management,December:174-188(174), 1961
5 D. Lemack. “Leading students through the management theory jungle by following the path of the seminal theorist. A paradigmatic approach”, Management Decision, 42(10):1309-1325(1313), 2004
6 S.M. Dahlgaard-Park, J. Dahlgaard. “Excellence – 25 years evolution”, Journal of Management History, 13(4):371-393. 2007
7 J. Petersen.“Defining Lean Production: some conceptual and practical issues”, The TQM Journal, 21(2):127-142. 2009
8 T.H. Davenport, J.E. Short. "The new industrial engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign", Sloan Management Review, 31(4):11, 1990
9 F.W. Taylor. ”The Principles of Scientific Management”, W.W. Norton & Company, New York,NY, adapted published in 1947, pp.36-37, 59 (1911).
10 B.A. Spencer. "Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation", Academy of Management Review, 19(3):453.1994
11 T.H. Davenport, S.L. Jarvenpaa, M. Beers. "Improving Knowledge Work Processes", Sloan Management Review, 37(4):55, 1996
12 M. Shibata, H. Kaneda. “Toyotashiki Saikyo no Keiei (The High Competitive Management of Toyota)”, Nihonkeiwai Shinbun, Tokyo. (in Japanese), pp. 92, (2001)
13 S. Wagner-Tsukamoto. ”Scientific Management revisited. Did Taylorism fail because of a too positive image of human nature”, Journal of Management History, 14(4), pp. 354, 2008
14 E. Yoneyama. “Phenomenology of Lifer: Zen and management”, Society and Business Review, 2(2): pp. 204-217, 2007
15 F.W. Taylor. “The Shop Management”, Scientific Management, Harper & Brothers, New York,p. 30. 1947a
16 D. Wren. “The Evolution of Management Thought”, Ronald Press, New York, NY. (1972)
17 F.W. Taylor. “Taylor’s Testimony Before the Special House Committee”, Scientific Management, Harper & Brothers, New York, pp. 26-27. 1947b
18 Y. Gorbaneff. ”Problemas, experimentos, juegos de roles para el pensamiento administrativo”, Documentos de Administración, Diciembre, 1: pp. 1-62. (in Spanish), 2007
19 H. Fayol. ”General and Industrial Management”, Pitman Publishing, New York, NY, adapted published in 1949, (1916)
20 M. Weber. ”Economy and Society”, University California Press, Berkeley CA, adapted published in 1968, (1922)
21 S. Robbin, Coulter, M. Management, Pearson, México, D.F., pp. 30, (2005)
22 P. Senge, Ch. Roberts, R. Rosss, B. Smith, A. Kleiner Senge. ”La Quinta Disciplina en la práctica. Estrategias y herramientas para construir la organización abierta al aprendizaje”,Granica, Buenos Aires. (in Spanish), pp. 123, (1995)
23 P. Senge. ”The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization”, Doubleday Currency, London. (1990)
24 F.E. Kast, J.E. Rosennzweigh. “General systems theory: applications for organizations and management”, Academy of Management Journal, December, pp. 447-465.
25 C.I. Barnard. ”The Functions of Executive”, Harvard Business University Press Cambridge,MA, originally published in 1938, pp. 81, (1968)
26 M. Harmon, R. Mayer. “Organization Theory for Public Administration”, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F. (in Spanish), (1999)
27 N. Wiener. “Cybernetics”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (1948)
28 J.M. Shafritz, J.S. Ott. “Classics of Organization Theory”, 5th ed., Harcourt, Orlando, FL.(2001).
29 L.V. Bertalanffy. ”General Systems Theory”, George Braziller, Nueva York, NY, pp. 36-37,(1968)
30 D.G. McFarlane. "Managing improvement in the public sector", Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 12(7-8), pp. 1047-1053. 2001
31 D. Katz, R. L. Kahn. “The Social Psychology of Organizations”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp. 66, 752, 52, (1966)
32 J.D. Thompson. “Organizations in Action”, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 67, (1967)
33 T. S. Khun. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, The University of Chicago Press,Chicago, IL, (1970)
34 P. Hermel, J. Ramis-Pujol. "An evolution of excellence: some main trends", The TQM Magazine, 15(4), pp. 242. 2003
35 T.J. Peters, R.H. Waterman. “In Search of Excellence – Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies”, Harper Collins Publishers, London, pp. 13-16, (1982)
36 R. Kaplan, D. Norton. “Mastering the Management System”, Harvard Business Review, 86(1):pp. 64-65, 2008
37 EFQM. “European Foundations of Quality Management”. EFQM, Brussels,(1999)
38 EFQM, Club de Excelencia de Gestión. “Modelo EFQM de Excelencia. Versión para el Sector Público y las Organizaciones del Voluntariado”. Madrid, Spain. (in Spanish), (2003)
39 B. Jacobs, S. Suckling. "Assessing customer focus using the EFQM Excellence Model: a local government case", The TQM Magazine, 19(4): pp. 366-378. 2007
40 R. McAdam, S. Hazlett, C. Casey. "Performance management in the UK public sector.Addressing multiple stakeholder complexity", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(3): pp. 256-273, 2005
41 C. George, F. Copper, A. Douglas. "Implementing the EFQM excellence model in a local authority", Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1-2): pp. 122-127, 2003
42 D.S. Steingard. “A postmodern deconstruction of Total Quality Management (TQM)”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(4), pp. 72-87, 1993
43 S.M. Dahlgaard-Park. ”Management control theories and the European business excellent model”, The Asian Journal on Quality, 4(1), 2003
44 B. Joubert. “ISO 9000: International quality standards”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 39(2):pp. 60-65. 1998
45 S. Rusell. "ISO 9000: 2000 and the EFQM excellence model: competition and co-operation".Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 11(4-6): pp. s6547-s665, 2000
46 ISO 9000:2000. “Norms ISO-9000 version 2000”. Quality Management. Geneva, Switzerland.2000
47 A. Van der Wiele, B.G. Dale, A. Williams. "ISO 9000 series registration to total quality management: the transformation journey", International Journal of Quality Science, 2(4):pp.236-252, 1997
48 A. Douglas, D. Kirk, C. Brennan, A. Ingram. “Maximizing the benefits of ISO 9000 implementation”, Total Quality Management, 10(4-5):pp. 507-513, 1999
49 P. Singh, P. Mansour-Nahra. “ISO 9000 in the public sector: a successful case from Australia”, The TQM Magazine, 18(2):pp. 131-142, 2006
50 P. Chung, C. Huang, H. Wang. “ISO 9000 and Public Organizations in Taiwan:Organizational Differences in Implementation Practices with Organization Size, Unionization and Service Types”, Public Organization Review, 1: pp. 391-413, 2001
51 A. Hsieh, C. Chou, C. Cheng. “Job standardization and service quality: a close look at the application of Total Quality Management to the public sector”, Total Quality Management,13(7): pp. 899-912, 2002
52 G.K. Kanji, P. Moura. "Performance Measurement and Business Excellence: The reinforcing link for the public sector", Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(1-2), pp.49-56,2007
53 S. Mansar, H.A. Reijers. “Best practices in business process redesign: validation of a redesign framework”, Computers in Industry, 56(5), 2005
54 J.H. Harrington. “The fallacy of universal best practices”, Total Quality Management & Excellence, 15(5-6), 2004
55 D. Sinclair, M. Zairi. "Effective process management through performance measurement Part II - benchmarking total quality -based performance measurement for best practice", Business Process Management Journal, 1(2): pp. 58-66, 1995
56 J. Liker. “The Toyota Way – 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer”, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, (2004)
57 Y. Tsukuda. “Why is Toyota alone so profitable in these Times of Upheavel?” Nihonkeiwai Shinbun, Tokyo, (in Japanese), 2001
58 Y. Monden. “Toyota Production System. An integrated approached to Just in Time”.Engineering & Management Press, Norcross Georgia, pp. 1, 250, 10, (1998)
59 E. Ozono, N. Shimizu, H. Takeuchi. “Extreme Toyota, Radical contradictions that drive success at the world best manufacturer”, John Wiley Songs, Inc., New Jerseys, (2008)
60 M.F. Suárez-Barraza, E. Bou, C. Cataldo. “Finding Standards, Routines and Non-Routines in Toyota Production System (TPS): Standardization without Standardization?” Lean Manufacturing Journal-Reliable Plant Magazine, September 05, pp. 1-32. White papers of www.reliableplant.com, 2008
61 S. Hino. Inside the Mind of Toyota. Productivity Press, New York, NY. (2006)
62 J. Dahlgaard, S.M. Dahlgaard-Park. “4P strategy for breakthrough and sustainable development”, European Quality, 10(4):pp. 6-20, 2004
63 W. Bucley. “Sociology and Modern System Theory”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.(1967)
64 W.E. Deming. ”New Economics”, Center for Adv.Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA. (1993)
65 L. Krajeswky, L. Ritzman, M. Malhortra. “Operations Management, process and value chains, Editorial Pearson International, New York, NY, (2007)
66 G. Hamel. “Moon Shots for Management. Hamel respond”, Harvard Business Review, 87(6):pp. 108-109. (2009b)
67 M.F. Suárez-Barraza, Lingham, T. “Kaizen within Kaizen Teams: Continuous and Process Improvements in a Spanish municipality”, The Asian Journal on Quality, 9(1); pp. 1-21.
Mr. Manuel F. Suárez-Bar
er - Mexico
Mr. Juan Ramis-Pujol
- Spain
Mr. Miguel Ángel Heras
- Spain