Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Dynamic Capabilities in SMEs: The Integration of External Competencies
Vlatka Skokic, Marko Coh, Marko Torkkeli
Pages - 54 - 70     |    Revised - 31-08-2015     |    Published - 30-09-2015
Volume - 6   Issue - 3    |    Publication Date - September / October 2015  Table of Contents
Dynamic Capabilities, SMEs, Relationship Capability, External Competencies, External Environment.
In spite of substantial body of theoretical and conceptual contributions, empirical evidence of nature of dynamic capabilities and their influence on firm performance is still relatively scarce. We present review of empirical studies of well-known processes that highlight constituting elements of dynamic capabilities, and conclude that relatively little research has been conducted to address managerial practices and processes employed to integrate external competencies. We propose concept of ‘relationship capability’, that denotes integrative dynamic capability constituted of managerial practices and processes that are employed in SMEs, first, to sense and interpret firm’s environment, second, to reconfigure internal organizational processes to integrate external competencies in the firm and third, to develop specialized offerings based on platforms.
CITED BY (0)  
1 Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
2 Google Scholar
3 CiteSeerX
4 refSeek
5 Scribd
6 slideshare
7 PdfSR
1 Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
2 Barney, J.B. (1986). ‘Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy’, Management Science, 32(10), pp. 1231–1241.
3 Barney, J.B. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.
4 Boeker, W. (1989). ‘Strategic change: The effects of founding and history’, Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), pp. 489-515.
5 Bourgeois, L. and K. Eisenhardt (1988). ‘Strategic decision processes in high velocity enviroments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry’, Management Science, 34(7), pp. 816-835.
6 Burgelman, R.A. (1994). ‘Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), pp. 24–56.
7 Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
8 Clark, D.N. (2000). ‘Implementation issues in core competence strategy making’, Strategic Change, 9(2), pp. 115-127.
9 Collis, D.J. (1994). ‘Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities ?’, Strategic Management Journal, 15(Special Issue), pp. 143–152.
10 Conner, K.R. (1991). ‘A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 121-154.
11 Dierickx I. and K. Cool (1989). ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science, 35(12), pp. 1504–1511.
12 Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989a), ‘Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments’, Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), pp. 543–576.
13 Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989b), ‘Building theories from case study research’, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 543–576.
14 Eisenhardt, K.M. and J. Martin (2000). ‘Dynamic capabilities: What are they?’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), pp. 1105-1121.
15 Glaser, B., and A. Strauss (1967), The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London.
16 Gulati, R. (1998). ‘Alliances and networks’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), pp. 293317.
17 Hansen, M.T. (1999). ‘The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), pp. 82– 111.
18 Hargadon, A. and R.I. Sutton (1997). ‘Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), pp. 716–749.
19 Helfat, C.E. and R.S. Raubitschek (2000), ‘Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), pp. 961–979.
20 Iansiti, M. and R. Levien (2004b). The Keystone Advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
21 Kale, P., J.H. Dyer and H. Singh (2002). ‘Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of alliance function’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), pp. 747-767.
22 Katzy, B., M. Dissel and F. Blindow (2001). ‘Dynamic capabilities for entrepreneurial venturing: the Siemens ICE case’, IAMOT 2001 Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland.
23 Kogut, B. (1989). ‘The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(2), pp. 183-198.
24 Macher, J. and D. Mowery (2001). ‘Measuring dynamic capabilities: practices and performance in semiconductor manufacturing’, Georgetown University working paper.
25 Marsden, P.V. (1981). ‘Introducing influence processes into a system of collective decisions’, American Journal of Sociology, 86, pp. 1203-1235.
26 Miles, M.B., M. Huberrman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
27 Podolny, J.M. (1994). ‘Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), pp. 458-483.
28 Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996). ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 116-135.
29 Prahalad, C.K. and G. Hamel (1990). ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), May-June, pp. 79-91.
30 Priem, R.L. and J.E. Butler (2001). ‘Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?’, Academy of Management Review, 26(1), pp. 22-40.
31 Rumelt, R.P. (1984). ‘Towards a strategic theory of the firm’, in Competitive Strategic Management, ed. R.B. Lamb, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 556-570.
32 Sull, N. (1999). ‘Why good companies go bad’, Harvard Business Review, 77(4), pp. 42–52.
33 Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
34 Teece, D.J. (1998). ‘Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets’, California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 55-79.
35 Wernerfelt, B. (1984). ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), pp. 171–180.
36 Williamson, O.E. (1999). ‘Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), pp. 1087-1108.
37 Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38 Zollo, M., and S.G. Winter (1999). ‘From organizational routines to dynamic capabilities’, A working paper of Reginald H. Jones Center, The Wharton School WP 99-07.
39 Zollo, M., and S.G. Winter (2002). ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities’, Organization Science, 13(3), pp. 339-351.
40 Zott, C. (2003). ‘Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), pp. 97125.
Dr. Vlatka Skokic
University of Surrey - United Kingdom
Dr. Marko Coh
Maxxim Consulting London, W1F 7JW, UK - United Kingdom
Dr. Marko Torkkeli
School of Business and Management Lappeenranta University of Technology P.O.Box 20, FI-53851, Lappeenranta, Finland - Finland