Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(131.46KB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.

PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES

Top researchers from over 74 countries worldwide have trusted us because of quality publications.

United States of America
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
Malaysia
China
Japan
Saudi Arabia
Egypt
India
A Novel Method for Quantitative Assessment of Software Quality
C. V. Srikrishna, Neelam Bawane
Pages - 508 - 517     |    Revised - 30-12-2009     |    Published - 31-01-2010
Volume - 3   Issue - 6    |    Publication Date - January 2010  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
quality assurance, quality metrics, quality model, stakeholders
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with quantitative quality model that needs to be practiced formally through out the software development life cycle at each phase. Proposed quality model emphasizes that various stakeholders need to be consulted for quality requirements. The quality goals are set through various measurements and metrics. Software under development is evaluated against expected value of set of metrics. The use of proposed quantitative model is illustrated through a simple case study. The unaddressed quality attribute reusability in ISO 9126 is also discussed.
CITED BY (12)  
1 Yahlali, M., & Chouarfia, A. (2015). Towards a software component assembly evaluation. Software, IET, 9(1), 1-6.
2 Chouarfia, M. Y. A. (2014). SCAE: Software Component Assembly Evaluation.
3 Thapar, S. S., Singh, P., & Rani, S. (2014). Reusability-based quality framework for software components. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 39(2), 1-5.
4 Vern, R., & Dubey, S. K. (2013). A Survey on Evaluation of the Quality of Software System by Using Fuzzy Logic Approach. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 13(1).
5 Tegegne, W., Belachew, M., & Kifle, M. (2013). Quantification of Software Requirements Specification and Software Quality: Quantitative Approach. HiLCoE Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 144.
6 Hmood, A. (2013). A Unified Metamodel for Assessing and Predicting Software Evolvability Quality (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).
7 Tomar, A., & Thakare, V. M. (2013). A Customized Model on Software Quality Assurance & Reuse. International Journal Of Computer Science And Applications, 6(2).
8 Thapar, S. S., Singh, P., & Rani, S. (2012). Challenges to Development of Standard Software Quality Model. International Journal of Computer Applications, 49(10).
9 Dunne, K. J. (2011). From vicious to virtuous cycle. Translation and Localization Project Management: The Art of the Possible, 16, 153.
10 Dunne, K. I. (2011). From vicious to virtuous cycle Customer-focused translation quality management. Translation and Localization Project Management: The art of the possible, 153.
11 A. O.Bajeh, “A Novel Metric for Measuring the Readability of Software Source Code”, Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(10), pp. 492-497, October 2011.
12 A. B. Tomar and Dr.V. M. Thakare, “A Systematic Study of Software Quality Models”, International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 2(4), pp. 61-70, October 2011.
1 Google Scholar 
2 Academic Journals Database 
3 ScientificCommons 
4 Academic Index 
5 CiteSeerX 
6 refSeek 
7 iSEEK 
8 Socol@r  
9 ResearchGATE 
10 Libsearch 
11 Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) 
12 Scribd 
13 WorldCat 
14 SlideShare 
15 PdfSR 
16 PDFCAST 
1 Andres Sousa-Poza, Mert Altinkilinc, Cory Searcy, “Implementing a Functional ISO 9001 Quality Management System in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, International Journal of Engineering, v. 3 Issue 3, 2009
2 Arun Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, P.S. Grover, "Dependency Analysis for Component- Based Software Systems", ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.34 n.4, July 2009 [DOI: 10.1145/1543405.1543424]
3 Arun Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, P.S. Grover, “Managing Component-Based Systems With Reusable Components”, International Journal of Computer Science and Security, v. 1 Issue 2, 2007
4 Ashley Williams, “The documentation of quality engineering: applying use cases to drive change in software engineering models”, SIGDOC '04: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international conference on Design of communication: The engineering of quality documentation, October 2004
5 Avadhesh Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, P.S. Grover, “An Evaluation of Maintainability of Aspect- Oriented Systems: a Practical Approach”, International Journal of Computer Science and Security, v. 1 Issue 2, 2007
6 B. Boehm et al., “Win Win requirements negotiation process: A multi project analysis”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process, Chicago, 1998
7 B. Kitchenham, S. L. Pfleeger, “Software Quality: The Elusive Target”, IEEE Software, vol. 13(1), pp.12-21, 1996
8 B. W. Boehm, J. R. Brown, H. Kaspar, M. Lipow, G. McLeod, and M. Merritt, “Characteristics of Software Quality”, North Holland, (1978)
9 D. Garvin, "What Does 'Product Quality' Really Mean?" Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp 25-45, 1984
10 E. Georgiadou “Software Process and Product Improvement: A Historical Perspective”, International Journal of Cybernetics, Volume 1, No1, pp172-197, Jan 2003
11 E. Georgiadou, “GEQUAMO– A Generic, Multilayered, Customisable, Software Quality Model”, International Journal of Cybernetics, Volume 11, Number 4 , pp 313-323 November 2003
12 Gordon W. Skelton, “Integrating total quality management with software engineering education”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Volume 25 Issue 2, June 1993
13 ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems Fundamentals and vocabulary, 2005
14 ISO 9001:2000 Quality management systems Requirements, 2001
15 ISO 9004:2000 Quality management systems Guidelines for performance improvement, 2000
16 ISO/IEC, IS 9126-1, “Software Engineering – Product Quality – Part 1: Quality Model”, Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2001
17 17] ISO: ISO/IEC 14598-1. International Standard Information technology software product evaluation, 1999
18 J. Bøegh, S. DePanfilis, B. Kitchenham, A. Pasquini, “A Method for Software Quality Planning, Control and Evaluation”. IEEE Software, 69-77, March/April 1999
19 J.A. McCall, P.K. Richards and G. F. Walters, “Factors in software quality”, Griffiths Air Force Base, N.Y. : Rome Air Development Center Air Force Systems Command, 1977
20 J.W. Moore, “Software Engineering Standards: A User’s Road Map”, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1998
21 K. Khosravi, & Y.G. Gueheneuc, “A quality model for design patterns”, http://www.yann_gael.gueheneuc.net/work/Tutoring/Documents/041021+Khosravi+Technic al+Report. doc.pdf, 2004
22 K.V. Siaka, E. Berki, E. Georgiadou, C. Sadler, “The Complete Alphabet of Quality Software Systems: Conflicts and Compromises”, 7th World Congress on Total Quality & Qualex 97, New Delhi, India, 17-19, February 1997
23 K.V. Siaka, E. Georgiadou, “PERFUMES: A Scent of Product Quality Characteristics”, SQM, UK, March 2005
24 M. Lorenz, J. Kidd, “Object-Oriented Software Metrics”, 1st Ed. Prentice Hall,1994
25 M. Ortega, M. Perez, & T. Rojas, “Construction of a systemic quality model for evaluating a software product”, Software Quality Journal 11: 219-242, 2003
26 N. E. Fenton, and M. Neil, “A Critique of Software Defect Prediction Models”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (25:5), pp.675-689, September/October 1999
27 P. Bourque, R. Dupuis, A. Abran, J.W. Moore, L.L. Trippet S. Wolff, “Fundamental Principles of Software Engineering - A Journey”, Journal of Systems and Software, 2000
28 R. G. Dromey, “A Model for Software Product Quality”, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., pp 146-162, 1995
29 R. G. Dromey, “Software product quality: Theory, model and practice. Software Quality Institute,” Griffith University, Brisbane, Technical Report, 1999
30 S. Godbole, “Software Quality Assurance: Principles and Practices”, Alpha Science International Ltd., 2004
31 Software Engineering Institute, “The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process”, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994
32 T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw Hill, Inc., New York NY, 1980
33 V.R. Basili and H.D. Rombach, “The TAME projects: Towards improvement-oriented software environment”, IEEE Transactions in Software Engineering, 14, no.6, Nov 1988
34 W. Suryn, “Course notes SYS861”, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, 2003
Dr. C. V. Srikrishna
- India
Dr. Neelam Bawane
- India