Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(1.52MB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
Numerical Study of Flow Separation Control by Tangential and Perpendicular Blowing on the NACA 0012 Airfoil
Kianoosh Yousefi, S. Reza Saleh, Peyman Zahedi
Pages - 10 - 24     |    Revised - 15-01-2013     |    Published - 28-02-2013
Volume - 7   Issue - 1    |    Publication Date - April 2013  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Blowing, Blowing Amplitude and Coefficient, Flow Control, NACA 0012 Airfoil, Lift and Drag Coefficients.
ABSTRACT
In this study, tangential and perpendicular steady blowing at the trailing edge of NACA 0012 airfoil is investigated numerically to flow separation control and to study the effects of blowing amplitude and blowing coefficient on airfoil aerodynamic characteristics. Flow was fully turbulent with the Reynolds number of 5105 and the turbulent employed model was the Menter’s shear stress model. Blowing on airfoil is modeled in tangential (tangential blowing) and perpendicular (perpendicular blowing) form and length of blowing jet is 3.5 percent of chord length. Considering previous studies, blowing jet is optimum in two distances on the airfoil surface, one around 40 percent and the other around 80 percent of chord length from the leading edge, which in this study blowing jet is placed at 80 percent of the chord length from the leading edge. Blowing velocity from 0.1 to 0.5 is considered of freestream velocity. Results of tangential blowing show that by increasing amplitude of blowing, lift and drag coefficients changes are inconsiderable. Maximum increase of lift to drag ratio in amplitude of 0.5, around 16.5 percent, but in perpendicular blowing lower amplitude of blowing is more appropriate. Also tangential blowing has no effect on stall angle and cause gradual stall of NACA 0012 airfoil, whereas perpendicular blowing improve stall angle from 14 to 16 degrees.
CITED BY (7)  
1 James, S. E., Suryan, A., Sebastian, J. J., Mohan, A., & Kim, H. D. (2018). Comparative study of boundary layer control around an ordinary airfoil and a high lift airfoil with secondary blowing. Computers & Fluids, 164, 50-63.
2 Akbarzadeh, P., Lehdarboni, A. A., & Derazgisoo, S. M. (2018). Low Reynolds unsteady flow simulation around NACA0012 airfoil with active flow control. Meccanica, 53(14), 3457-3476.
3 Moghaddam, T., & Neishabouri, N. B. (2017, October). On the Active and Passive Flow Separation Control Techniques over Airfoils. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 248, No. 1, p. 012009). IOP Publishing.
4 Behboodi, A., & Salehi, S. (2017, October). SDRE controller for motion design of cable-suspended robot with uncertainties and moving obstacles. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 248, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.
5 Montazer, E., Mirzaei, M., Salami, E., Ward, T. A., Romli, F. I., & Kazi, S. N. (2016, October). Optimization of a synthetic jet actuator for flow control around an airfoil. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 152, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.
6 Yousefi, K., & Saleh, R. (2014). The effects of trailing edge blowing on aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil and optimization of the blowing slot geometry. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 52(1), 165-179.
7 Yousefi, K., Saleh, R., & Zahedi, P. (2014). Numerical study of blowing and suction slot geometry optimization on NACA 0012 airfoil. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28(4), 1297-1310.
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 refSeek 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
1 M. Gad-el-hak. Control Flow: Passive, Active and Reactive Flow Management. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 25-35.
2 A.L. Braslow, “A History of Suction Type Laminar Flow Control with Emphasis on Flight Research,” NASA History Division, Monograph in Aerospace History, Number 13, 1999.
3 D.F. Abzalilov, L.A. Aksentev and N.B. IL’Inskii, “The Inverse Boundary-Value Problem for an Airfoil with a Suction Slot,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 61, pp.75-82, 1997.
4 S.S. Ravindran, “Active Control of Flow Separation Over an Airfoil,” Report of Langley Research Center, 1999.
5 M.B. Glauert, “The Design of Suction Aerofoils with a Very Large CL-Range,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 2111, 1945.
6 M.B. Glauert, W.S. Walker, W.G. Raymer and N. Gregory, “Wind Tunnel Tests on a Thick Suction Airfoil with a Single Slot,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 2646, 1948.
7 M.B. Glauert, “The Application of the Exact Method of Aerofoil Design,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 2683, 1947.
8 S. Dirlik, K. Kimmel, A. Sekelsky and J. Slomski, “Experimental Evaluation of a 50-Percent Thick Airfoil with Blowing and Suction Boundary Layer Control,” AIAA Paper, Vol. 92, 1992.
9 D.M. Heugen, “An Experimental Study of a Symmetrical Aerofoil with a Rear Suction Slot and a Retractable Flap,” Journal of Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 57, 1953.
10 H.J. Howe and B.J. Neumann, “An Experimental Evaluation of a Low Propulsive Power Discrete Suction Concept Applied to an Axisymmetric Vehicle,” David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center TM 16-82/02, 1982.
11 J.H. Preston, N. Gregory and A.G. Rawcliffe, “The Theoretical Estimation of Power Requirements for Slot-Suction Aerofoils with Numerical Results for Two Thick Griffith Type Sections,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 1577, 1948.
12 E.J. Richards, and C.H. Burge, “An Airfoil Designed to Give Laminar Flow Over the Surface with Boundary Layer Suction,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 2263, 1943.
13 E.J. Richards, W.S. Waler and C.R. Taylor, “Wind Tunnel Tests on 30-Percent Suction Wing,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M 2149, 1945.
14 D.P. Rizzetta, M.R. Visbal and M.J. Stank, “Numerical Investigation of Synthetic Jet Flow Fields,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 919-927, 1999.
15 J.Z. Wu, X.Y. Lu, A.G. Denny, M. Fan and J.M. Wu, “Post-Stall Flow Control on an Airfoil by local Unsteady Forcing,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 371, PP. 21-58, 1998.
16 C. Nae, “Synthetics Jets Influence on NACA0012 Airfoil at High Angle of Attacks,” AIAA Papers, PP. 98, 1998.
17 L. Huang, P.G. Huang and R.P. LeBeau, “Numerical Study of Blowing and Suction Control Mechanism on NACA0012 Airfoil,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004.
18 C.R. Rosas, “Numerical Simulation of Flow Separation Control by Oscillatort Fluid Injection,”Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, A&M University, Texas, 2005.
19 N.K. Beliganur and P. Raymond, “Application of Evolutionary Algorithms to Flow Control Optimization,” Report of University of Kentuchky, 2007.
20 D. You and P. Moin, “Active Control of Flow Separation Over an Airfoil Using Synthetic Jets,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 24, pp. 1349-1357, 2008.
21 E. Akcayoz and I.H. Tuncer, “Numerical Investigation of Flow Control Over an Airfoil Using Synthetic Jets and its Optimization,” International Aerospace Conference, Turkey, 2009.
22 S.H. Kim and C. Kim, “Separation Control on NACA23012 Using Synthetic Jet,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 13, pp.172-182, 2009.
23 A.T. Piperas, “Investigation of Boundary Layer Suction on a Wind Turbine Airfoil Using CFD,” Master Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2010.
24 M.S. Genc, U. Keynak and H. Yapici, “Performance of Transition Model for Predicting Low Re Aerofoil Flows Without/With Single and Simultaneous Blowing and Suction,” European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids, Vol. 30, pp. 218-235, 2011.
25 B Yagiz, O. Kandil and Y. V. Pehlivanoglu, “Drag Minimization Using Active and Passive Flow Control Techniques,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 17, pp. 21-31, 2011.
26 K. Yousefi, S.R. Saleh and P. Zahedi, “Investigation for Increase or Decrease The Lift and Drag Coefficient on The Airfoil with Suction and Blowing,” International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Technology, Iran, 2012.
27 F.R. Menter, M. Kuntz and R. Langtry, “Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model,” 4th International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer,Turkey, 2003.
28 L.K. Voigt, J.N. Sorensen, J.M. Pedersen and M. Crons, “Review of Four Turbulence Models Using Topology,” 8th International IBPSA Conference, Netherlands, 2003.
29 C.C. Critzos, H.H. Heyson and W. Boswinkle, “Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA0012 Airfoil Section at Angle of Attacks from 0° to 180°,” Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Washington, NACA Technical Note 3361, 1955.
30 E. Jacobs and A. Sherman, “Airfoil Section Characteristic as Affected by Variations of the Reynolds Number”, NACA Report 586,231, 1937.
31 ] R.E. Sheldhal and Klimas, “Aerodynamic Characteristics of Seven Airfoil Sections Through 180 Degrees Angle of Attack for use In Aerodynamic Analysis of Vertical Axis Wind Tunnel”,Sandia National Labs., Report No. SAND80-2114, Albuquerque, March 1981.
32 M. Goodarzi, R. Fereidouni and M. Rahimi, “Investigation of Flow Control Over a NACA 0012 Airfoil by Suction Effect on Aerodynamic Characteristics”, Canadian Journal of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 102-108, 2012.
33 I.H. Abbott and A.E. Von Doenhoff. Theory of Wing Sections. Dover, 1959.
34 R. Eppler. Airfoil Design and Data. Springer, 1990.
35 J. Olejniczak and A.S. Lyrintzis, “Design of Optimized Airfoils in Subcritical Flow”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 30, pp. 680-687, 1994.
36 A. Seifert, A. Darabi and I. Wygnansky, “Delay of Airfoil Stall by Periodic Extinction”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 33, pp. 691-698, 1996.
Mr. Kianoosh Yousefi
Department of Mechanical Engineering Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch Mashhad, 91735-413 - Iran
kianoosh_py@yahoo.com
Associate Professor S. Reza Saleh
Department of Mechanical Engineering Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch Mashhad, 91735-413 - Iran
Mr. Peyman Zahedi
Department of Mechanical Engineering Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch Mashhad, 91735-413 - Iran