Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(274.86KB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Unsupervised Categorization of Objects into Artificial and Natural Superordinate Classes Using Features from Low-Level Vision
Zahra Sadeghi, Majid Nili Ahmadabadi, Babak Nadjar Araabi
Pages - 339 - 352     |    Revised - 15-08-2013     |    Published - 15-09-2013
Volume - 7   Issue - 4    |    Publication Date - September 2013  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Objects' Super-class Categorization, Low Level Visual Features, Categorization of Objects to Artificial and Natura, Local and Global Features, Color, Orientation, Frequency.
ABSTRACT
Object recognition problem has mainly focused on classification of specific object classes and not much work is devoted to the problem of automatic recognition of general object classes. The aim of this paper is to distinguish between the highest levels of conceptual object classes (i.e. artificial vs. natural objects) by defining features extracted from energy of low level visual characteristics of color, orientation and frequency. We have examined two modes of global and local feature extraction. In local strategy, only features from a limited number of random small windows are extracted, while in global strategy, features are taken from the whole image.

Unlike many other object recognition approaches, we used unsupervised learning technique for distinguishing between two classes of artificial and natural objects based on experimental results which show that distinction of visual object super-classes is not based on long term memory. Therein, a clustering task is performed to divide the feature space into two parts without supervision. Comparison of clustering results using different sets of defined low level visual features show that frequency features obtained by applying Fourier transfer could provide the highest distinction between artificial and natural objects.
CITED BY (2)  
1 Sadeghi, Z., Nadjar Araabi, B., & Nili Ahmadabadi, M. (2015). A Computational Approach towards Visual Object Recognition at Taxonomic Levels of Concepts. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2015.
2 Sadeghi, Z. (2015). Children’s Line Drawings and Object Representation Strategies: Categorization of Children’s Mental Representation Strategies According to the Existing Theories for Object Recognition by Studying Line Drawings.
1 Google Scholar
2 CiteSeerX
3 refSeek
4 Scribd
5 SlideShare
6 PdfSR
1 D. Marr. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information.New York. W.H. Freeman.
2 T. Tuytelaars, C. H.Lampert, M. B. Blaschko, W.Buntine. “Unsupervised Object Discovery: A Comparison.”
3 M. Szummer, R. W. Picard. (1998). “Indoor-outdoor image classification, Proceeding of International Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Databases,Bombay”.
4 E.C. Yiu, (1996). “Image classiffication using color cues and texture orientation.”
5 M.J. Kane, A.E. Savakis. (2004). “Bayesian Network StructureLearning and Inference in Indoor vs. Outdoor Image Classification.”
6 N. Serrano, A.E. Savakis, L. Luo. (2002). “A Computationally Efficient Approach to Indoor/Outdoor Scene Classification.”
7 M. Szummer, R.W. Picard. (1998). “Indoor-Outdoor Image Classification.”
8 Y.CARON, P. MAKRIS, N. VINCENT. (2002). “A method for detecting artificial objects in natural environments.” pp.600-603.
9 Y. Caron, P. Makris, N. Vincent. (2002). “A method for detecting artificial objects in natural environments.” IPCR, pp. 600 603.
10 D. Chenoweth, B. Cooper, J. Selvage. (1995). “Aerial Image Analysis Using FractalBased Models.” IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference Proceedings, pp. 277-285.
11 G. Cao, X. Yang, and Z. Mao. (2005). “A two-stage level set evolution scheme for man-made objects detection in aerial images.” Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., San Diego, CA, pp. 474-479.
12 B. S., Anami, V. Burkapalli, V. Handur, H.K.: Bhargav. “Discrimination of Artificial Objects from Natural Objects.”
13 M., Kim, C., Park K. Koo. “Natural / Man-Made Object Classification Based on Gabor Characteristics, Image and Video Retrieval, LNCS 3568, pp. 550-559
14 J. Tajima, H. Kono. (2008). “Natural Object/Artifact Image Classification Based on Line Features.” IEICE Transactions. 91-D(8), pp. 2207-2211.
15 Z.Wang, J. Ben Arie. (1999). “Generic Object Detection using Model Based Segmentation.”IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
16 A. Caramazza, J. R. Shelton. (1998). “Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain - the animate-inanimate distinction.” Neuroscience, Vol. 10, pp. 1-34.
17 T. Naselaris, D.E. Stansbury, J. L. Gallant. “Cortical representation of animate and inanimate objects in complex natural scenes.”
18 A.J., Wiggett, , I.C., Pritchard P.E. Downing. (2009). “Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category.”
19 A.H., Bell, F. Hadj-Bouziane, J.B., Frihauf, R.B., Tootell, L.G. Ungerleider. (2009). Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurophysiol 101, pp. 688-700.
20 D. Poulin-Dubois, S. Graham, L. Sippola. (1995). Early lexical development: The contribution of parental labeling and infants categorization abilities. Journal of Child Language: 22, pp.325-343.
21 D. H. Rakison. Parts, motion, and the development of the animate inanimate distinction in infancy. In D. H. Rakison, L. M. Oakes (Eds.) (2003). Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion, pp.159-192.
22 P.F. Felzenszwalb, D.P Huttenlocher. (2000). “Efficient matching of pictorial structures.” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.66-73.
23 B. Heisele. (2003). “Visual Object Recognition with Supervised Learning.” IEEE Intelligent Systems - AI's Second Century, pp. 38-42.
24 D.J., Crandall, P.F., Felzenszwalb, D.P. Huttenlocher, (2005). “Spatial priors for part- based recognition using statistical models”. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.10-17.
25 T. Deselaersa, G. Heigoldb, H. Ney. “Object Classification by Fusing SVMs and Gaussian Mixtures.”
26 J. M. Mandler, P. J. Bauer. (1988). “The cradle of categorization: Is the basic level basic?Cognitive Development.” 3(3), pp. 247-264.
27 J. M. Mandler, P. J. Bauer, L. McDonough. (1991). “Separating the sheep from the goats:Di_erentiating global categories.” Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp.263-298.
28 M. H. Bornstein, M. E. Arterberry. (1991). “The development of object categorization in young children: Hierarchical inclusiveness, age, perceptual attribute and group versus individual analyses.” Developmental Psychology: 46, pp. 350-365.
29 J. M. Mandler, L. McDonough. (1993). “Concept formation in infancy. Cognitive Development.” 8, pp. 291-318.
30 B.A., Younger, D.D. (2000). “Fearing, A global-to-basic trend inearly categorization: Evidence from a dualcategory habituation task.” Infancy. 1, pp. 47-58.
31 P.C. Quinn, M.H. Johnson, D. Mareschal, D.H. Rakison, B.A. Younger. (2000.).“Understanding early categorization: One process or two?.” Infancy. 1, pp.111-122.
32 S. Pauen. (2002). “The global-to-basic level shift in infants categorical thinking: First evidence from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development.” 26, pp. 492-499.
33 S. Pauen. (2002). “Evidence for knowledge-based category discrimination in infancy.” Child Development. 73,pp. 1016-1033.
34 K. Rostad, J. Yott, D. Poulin-Dubois. (2012). “Development of categorization in infancy:Advancing forward to the animate/inanimate level.” Infant Behav Dev.
35 E. Rosch, B.B. Lloyd. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Pp.27-48.
36 D.H. Hubel, T.N. Wiesel. (2005). “Brain and visual perception: the story of a 25-year collaboration.” Oxford University.
37 S.M. Zeki. (1976). “The functional organization of projections from Striate to prestriate visual cortex in the rhesus monkey. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.” 5, pp.591-600.
38 A. Oliva, A. Torralba. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42(3), pp. 145-175.
39 M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio. (1999). “Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex.”Nature Neuroscience.
40 M. Khosrowpour. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 1-5
41 J. Ponce, T.L. Berg, M. Everingham, D.A. Forsyth, M. Hebert, S. Lazebnik, M. Marszalek, C.Schmid, , Russell B.C., A. Torralba, C.K.I, Williams, J. Zhang, A Zisserman. “Dataset Issues in Object Recognition.”
42 Agarwal, S., Roth, D. (2002). “Learning a sparse representation for object detection. In: Proc.European Conf. Comp. Vision.” LNCS 23-53., Copenhagen, Denmark. pp.113-127.
43 A. Farhadi, I. Endres, D. Hoiem. (2010). “Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-category Generalization.”
44 R. Fergus, P. Perona, A. Zisserman. (2003.). Object class recognition by unsupervised scaleinvariant learning. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog. 2, pp. 264-271.
45 J. Xiao, J. Hays, K. Ehinger, A. Oliva, A. Torralba. (2010). “SUN Database: Large-scale Scene Recognition from Abbey to Zoo.” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
46 L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, P. Perona. (2004). “Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories.” CVPR,Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision.
47 S. A., Nene, S. K. Nayar, H. Murase. (1996). “Columbia Object Image Library (COIL-100)”Technical Report CUCS-006 96.
48 http://www.hemera.com
49 C.J., Van Rijsbergen. (1979). Information retrieval, Butterworths, London, second edition.
Miss Zahra Sadeghi
Cognitive Robotics Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box: 14395-515, Iran Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 19395-5746, Iran - Iran
zahra.sadeghi@ut.ac.ir
Mr. Majid Nili Ahmadabadi
Cognitive Robotics Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box: 14395-515, Iran Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 19395-5746, Iran - Iran
Mr. Babak Nadjar Araabi
Cognitive Robotics Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box: 14395-515, Iran Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 19395-5746, Iran - Iran