Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(113.11KB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
The Diffusion And Implementation of Innovation
Coyan Tromp
Pages - 18 - 30     |    Revised - 15-11-2012     |    Published - 31-12-2012
Volume - 2   Issue - 1    |    Publication Date - December 2012  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Knowledge Creation, Diffusion of Innovation, Technology Implementation, Change Management
ABSTRACT
In their efforts to try and meet the requirements of the ‘new economy’, corporations would be helped with a conceptual framework in which their innovative business models are combined with new perceptions of knowledge creation, the diffusion and implementation of innovations and change management. To come up with adequate problem analyses and (business) solutions for the complex issues they address, corporations need not only technological knowledge, but also have to gain insight into how technologies relate to the values of people, and how they can be implemented successfully. Action research set up in the form of reciprocal Human Resource Management projects is particularly designed to create solutions and implement strategies that cover this whole spectrum. In a corporate effort of academic researchers and experts in the field, technological and practical knowledge and skills are integrated in a mutual learning and knowledge creation process aimed at the implementation of innovative solutions. With that, it provides an answer to the call for a new knowledge and innovation paradigm that serves to support the ‘new economy’.
CITED BY (2)  
1 Jondle, D., Maines, T. D., Burke, M. R., & Young, P. How Leaders Can Survive the Next Financial Crisis.
2 Tromp, C. Beyond “Business as Usual”–A Truly Rational Approach to Smart Technology Implementation.
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 refSeek 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
1 VA. Brown, JA. Harris, JY. Russell (eds). Tackling Wicked ProblemsThrough the Transdisciplinary Imagination, Australian National University, 2010.
2 C. Mason, J. Simmons. ‘Forward looking or looking unaffordable? Utilising academic perspectives on corporate social responsibility to assess the factors influencing its adoption by business’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 2011, 20(2): 159-176.
3 I. Nonaka. ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’, Organization Science, 1994 5(1): 14-37.
4 S. Toulmin. Return to reason, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2001.
5 J. Habermas. Erkenntnis und Interesse, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968.
6 J. Habermas. ‘Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus’, In: Th. Adorno, AR.Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, KR. Popper, Der Positivusmusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand Verlag, 1969, pp. 235-266. (Also in English:Rationalism divided in two. In A. Giddens (ed). Positivism and Sociology, Londen: Heinemann,1974, pp. 195-223.)
7 J. Habermas 1981a. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns I & II, Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp Verlag.
8 M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scott, M. Trow. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society, London: SAGE, 1994.
9 H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
10 B. Ebersbergen, SJ. Herstad, A. Altmann. Knowledge spillovers to industry:Opportunities for universities of applied science, Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung,2012, 7(3): 73-79.
11 OECD. Benchmarking Industry-Science Relationships, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2002.
12 K. Nicolopoulou. ‘Towards a theoretical framework for knowledge transfer in the field of CSR and sustainability’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2011,30(6): 524 – 538. DOI: 10.1108/02610151111157738.
13 J. Balogun, M. Jenkins. ‘Re-conceiving change management: a knowledge-based perspective’, European Management Journal, 2003, 21( 2): 247-57.
14 L. Preuss, JR. Córdoba-Pachon. ‘A knowledge management perspective of corporate social responsibility’, Corporate Governance, 2009, 9(4): 517 – 527.
15 A. Repko. Interdisciplinary Research. Process and Theory, Los Angeles/London etc:SAGE, 2008.
16 D. Greenwood, M. Levin. Introduction to Action Research, Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oakes: SAGE, 1998.
17 P. Reason, H. Bradburry (Eds). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: SAGE, 2001.
18 BWM. Boog, L.Keune, C. Tromp. ‘Action Research and Emancipation’, Joumal of Community and Social Applied Psychology, 2003, 13 (6): 419-426.
19 H. Moser. Aktionsforschung als kritische Theorie der Sozialen Wissenschaft, München:Kösel Verlag, 1975.
20 H. Coenen. ‘The Model of Exemplarian Action Research’. In Theory and Practice of Action Research, B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune, R. Lammerts (eds), Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1996, pp. 13-21.
21 H. Chesbrough, RS. Rosenbloom. ‘The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies’,Industrial and Corporate Change, 2002, 11(3): 529–555.
22 H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West (Eds). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
23 H. Chesbrough. ‘Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore’.Strategy and Leadership, 2007, 35(6), 12–17.
24 D. Kindström. ‘Towards a service-based business model – Key aspects for future competitive advantage’, European Management Journal, 2010, Vol.28(6): 479-490. DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.002
25 K. Storbacka. ‘A solution business model: Capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions’, Industrial Marketing Management, 2011, Vol. 40(5): 699-711. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.003
26 G. Svensson.’ A corporate model of sustainable business practices: An ethical perspective’, Journal of World Business, 2010, 45(4): 336-345.
27 G. Svensson , B. Wagner. ‘A process directed towards sustainable business operations and a model for improving the GWP-footprint (CO2e) on Earth’, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2011, Vol .22(4): 451-462.
28 M. Bilgin. ‘The PEARL Model of Sustainable Development’, Social Indicators Research,2012, Vol.107(1): 19-35. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9824-7
29 A. Smaling. ‘Dialogical Partnership - The Relationship Between The Researcher and The Researched in Action Research’. In: B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune, R. Lammerts (eds),The Complexity of Relationships in Action Research, Tilburg: University Press, 1998,pp.1-16.
30 S. Sharma, J. Sharma, A. Devi. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: The Key Role of Human Resource Management’, Business Intelligence Journal, 2009, 2(1): 205-213.
31 BJ. Inyang, HO. Awa, RO. Enuoh. ‘CSR-HRM Nexus: Defining the Role Engagement of the Human Resources Professionals’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2011, 2(5): 118-126.
32 NM. Høgevold. ‘A corporate effort towards a sustainable business model; A case study from the Norwegian furniture industry’, European Business Review, 2011, Vol. 23(4):392-400. DOI: 10.1108/09555341111145771
33 G. Salaman, J. Storey, J. Billsberry. Strategic Human Resource Management: Defining the Field, Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
34 BE. Becker, MA. Huselid. ‘Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here?’ Journal of Management, 2006, 32(6): 898-925. DOI:10.1177/0149206306293668
35 TN. Garavan. ‘A Strategic Perspective on Human Resources Management’, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2007, 9(11): 11-30, DOI: 10.1177/1523422306294492.
36 M. Coenen-Hanegraaf, F. Coenen, B. Valkenburg. ‘Reciprocal HRM as exemplarian principle of development’. In Action Research: Empowerment and Reflection, B. Boog, H.Coenen, L. Keune (Eds), Tilburg: Dutch University Press, 2001, pp. 58-79.
37 A. Giddens. Central Problems in Social Theory - Action, Structure and Contra- diction in Social Analysis, London and Basingstoke: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1979.
38 A. Giddens. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press/Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1984.
39 J. Habermas. ‘Die Moderne - Ein unvollendetes Projekt’. In: idem. Kleine Politische Schriften I-IV, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1981b, pp. 444-464.
40 J. Habermas. ‘Modernity versus Postmodernity’, New German Critique, 1981c, 8(22): 3-14.
41 A. Giddens. ‘Modernism and Post-Modernism’, New German Critique, 1981, 8(22): 15-19.
42 A. Giddens. The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.
43 P. Bourdieu. An invitation to reflexive sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
44 U. Beck. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage, 1992.
45 U. Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash. Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
Dr. Coyan Tromp
Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies - Netherlands
j.c.tromp@uva.nl