Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(804.31KB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
A Comparison of Queueing Algorithms Over TCP Protocol
Mahmud Milud Mansour, Ahmed Hmeed
Pages - 275 - 293     |    Revised - 30-11-2019     |    Published - 31-12-2019
Volume - 13   Issue - 6    |    Publication Date - December 2019  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Congestion Control, TCP Reno, TCP New Reno, TCP Vegas, TCP/IP.
ABSTRACT
Network congestion control is one of the most key problems in network study. With the expansion of network size, the continuous increase of network bandwidth and increasing diversification of networking forms, congestion control has encountered some new problems that require a solution.

If a packet number that reaches the network is greater than the processing capacity of network, network performance would drop dramatically, resulting in an inevitable congestion. In order to avoid congestion, people use congestion control algorithm in the network.

This paper studies different versions of TCP source algorithms, such as Reno and Vegas, and investigate the impact of various Queuing management algorithms on the self-similarity of network traffic. We compare the performance of Reno and Vegas using various queue management algorithms, namely Droptail, Fair Queueing (FQ), Deficit Round Robin (DRR) and Random Early Detection (RED) using NS-2 network simulators. The characteristics of different algorithms are also discussed and compared based on the basis of packet loss, fairness and throughput metric.
1 Google Scholar 
2 refSeek 
3 Doc Player 
4 Scribd 
1 Lawrence G. Roberts, "Beyond Moore's Law: Internet Growth Trends," Computer, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 117-119, January 2000.
2 Jeonghoon Mo, Richard J. La, Venkat Anantharam, and Jean Walrand, Analysis and Comparison of TCP Reno and Vegas.
3 V. Jacobson. "Modified TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm", Technical report, 30 Apr.1990
4 M. Fomenkov, K. Keys, D. Moore, and K. Claffy, Longitudinal studyofInte rnettrafficin 1998-2003,WISICT'04:Proc.Winter Int. Symp. Info.Commun.Technol, 2004.
5 K. Fall, and S. Floyd, "Simulation-Based Comparison of Tahoe, Reno and SACK
6 TCP", Computer Communications Review ACMSIGCOMM, Vol. 26, No. 3, July 1996 K. Fall, and S. Floyd, "Simulation-Based Comparison of Tahoe, Reno and
7 SACK TCP", Computer Communications Review ACMSIGCOMM, Vol. 26, No. 3, July 1996.
8 M. Chiang, S. Low, A. Calderbank and J. Doyle, Layering as optimization decomposition: Amathematical theory of network architectures, Proc. of the IEEE,95(1): 255-312, 2007.
9 UDP Protocol,http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/course/inet-pages/udp.html. 5 NOV 2015.
10 UDP and TCP Segment Structure http ://searchnetworking.techtarget .com / definition/duplex http://www.ciscopress.com/store/cisco-ip-telephony-cipt -authorized-self-study-guide-9781587054099. , 22 Dec 2015.
11 Nagle, J. RFC 896: Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks (1984).
12 TCP Protocol http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/TCP. , 5 DEC 2015.
13 The Advantages and Disadvantages TCP and UDP http://smblog.iiitd .com /2010 /09 /advantages-and-disadvantages-of-tcp-and.html. , 31 DEC 2015.
14 V. Jacobson, "Congestion Avoidance and Control", In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM' 88, PP. 314-329, Stanford, CA, August 1988.
15 Chunlei Liu, B.Sc., M.S."Wireless Network Enhancements Using Congestion Coherence, Faster Congestion Feedback , Media Access Control and AAL2 Voice Trunking " 2001, The Ohio State University.
16 B.B. et al."Recommendations on queue management and congestion avoidance in the internet". RFC 2309, April 1998.
17 Romanow and S.Floyd. "The dynamics of TCP over ATM networks . In Proceedings,1994 SIGCOMM Conference , , London, 1994.
18 N.Yin and M. G. Hluchyj."Implication of dropping packets from the front of a queue.proc".7th ITC seminar ,1990.
19 T.Lakshman, A. Neidhardt, and T. Ott. The drop from front strategy in tcp and in tcp over atm,1996.
20 S. Floyd and V.Jacobson. "Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance". IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,Aug.1993.
21 J. Postal."Internet control message protocol icmp",1981,ISI.
22 Michael Welzl "Network Congestion Control Managing Internet Traffic" John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2005.
Dr. Mahmud Milud Mansour
Faculty of Information Technology, Department of Network Engineering, Tripoli University, Tripoli, Libya - Libya
mm.mansour67@gmail.com
Mr. Ahmed Hmeed
Faculty of Information Technology, Department of Network Engineering, Tripoli University, Tripoli, Libya - Libya