Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
Performance Evaluation of Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols Based on Network Size for MANET
Ritika , Nipur
Pages - 34 - 42     |    Revised - 15-01-2012     |    Published - 21-02-2012
Volume - 6   Issue - 1    |    Publication Date - February 2012  Table of Contents
Ad hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes where wireless radio interface connects each device in a MANET to move freely, independently and randomly. Routing protocols in mobile ad hoc network helps to communicate source node with destination node by sending and receiving packets. Lots of protocols are developed in this field but it is not easier to decide which one is winner. In this paper, we present investigations on the behavior of five routing protocols AODV (Ad hoc On demand distance vector), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), DYMO (Dynamic MANET On demand), OLSR (Optimized link state routing) and ZRP (Zone routing protocol) based on IEEE 802.11CSMA/CA MAC protocol are analyzed and compared using QualNet simulator on the basis of performance metrics such as Average Jitter, Total Packets Received, Packet Delivery Ratio, End-to-End Delay, Throughput, Average Queue Length, Average time in Queue, dropped packets due to non availability of routes and Energy consumption in transmit and receive Mode. To test competence and effectiveness of all five protocols under diverse network scenarios costing is done by means varying load by varying CBR data traffic load, changing number of Nodes and mobility. Finally results are scrutinized in from different scenarios to provide qualitative assessment of the applicability of the protocols.
CITED BY (1)  
1 Philip, C., Paulus, R., & Ashok, A. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Adhoc Routing Protocols in Wi-Fi & Wi Max Networks using QualNet 6.1. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 4(1).
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
1 M. Naserian, K.E. Tepe, and M. Tarique, Routing Overhead Analysis for Reactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, IEEE WiMob 2005, Vol.3, pp. 87-92, Montreal, Canada, August 2005.
2 P.P. Pham and S. Perrau, Performance Analysis of Reactive Shortest Path and Multipath Routing Mechanism With Load Balance, in Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2003, pp. 251-259, San Francisco, USA, April 2003.
3 L. Viennot, P. Jacquet, and T.H. Clausen, Analyzing Control Traffic Overhead versus Mobility and Data Traffic Activity in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Protocols, Wireless Networks, Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 447-455, July 2004
4 J. Broch, David A. Maltz, David B. Johnson, Y-Ch Hu and J Jetcheva, “A performance Comparison of Multi-hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network for mobile ad hoc networks”, in Proc. 4th annual IEEE/ACM international conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Dallas, Texas, U.S.Oct. 1998, pp. 85-97.
5 Josh Broch, David B. Johnsson, David A. Maltz, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”. Draft, draft-ietf-manet-dsr-00.txt, October 1999. Work in progress.
6 Qualnet Simulator www.scalable-networks.com.
7 Ian D. Chakeres and Charles E. Perkins. Dynamic MANET on demand (DYMO) routing protocol. Internet-Draft Version 06, IETF, October 2006.
8 Charles E. Perkins, Elizabeth M. Royer, Samir R. Das, "Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing", IETF Draft, 33 pages, October 1999.
9 Z. J. Haas and M. R. Pearlman, “Zone Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks”, tech. rep., Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF), Nov. 1997
10 Charles Perkins, Elizabeth Royer, and Samir Das. “Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing”. IETF RFC No. 3561, July 2003.
11 A. Laouti, P. Muhlethaler, A. Najid and E. Plakoo: “Simulation results of the OLSR routing protocol for wireless network”, INRIA Rocquencourt, Project Hipercom 2002.
12 IEEE, 1997, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical layer PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. 802.11.
Dr. Ritika
DIT, Dehradun - India
Associate Professor Nipur
- India