Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Full Text Available

(148.79KB)
This is an Open Access publication published under CSC-OpenAccess Policy.
Publications from CSC-OpenAccess Library are being accessed from over 74 countries worldwide.
Proposed an Integrated Model to Detect The Defect in Software Development Projects
Ayman E. Khedr, Ahmed Fouad Omran
Pages - 52 - 59     |    Revised - 15-05-2012     |    Published - 20-06-2012
Volume - 3   Issue - 3    |    Publication Date - May / June 2012  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Quality Assurance, Software Inspection, Software Testing, Software Development Projects
ABSTRACT
Currently, software quality assurance does not apply completely on the development of software industry and this leads to some challenges in the industry of software, specially, concerning cost and time consuming. While, the success of software development project depends on the application quality assurance standards, which starts by the pre-project and continue through the project till it reaches the user at the end. The aim of this model is the challenge to produce not only the software development project without defects but also the customer’s acceptance and satisfaction of the software. Thus to prevent software development project failure, this defect should be detected at an early stage.This study will deal with; the quality assurance inspection and testing, in the whole stages of software development projects. Then proposing the quality assurance inspection and testing model for the software development projects process, which known as “Integrated Model”.
1 Google Scholar 
2 CiteSeerX 
3 refSeek 
4 Scribd 
5 SlideShare 
6 PdfSR 
1 GALIN, D., Software Quality Assurance: from theory to implementation, (2004), 50(1), pp.14- 34.
2 Ashrafi, N. The impact of software process improvement on quality: In theory and practice. Information & Management, (2003), 40(7), pp.677–690.
3 Heusser, M., An ounce of prevention. Better Software, 3, 48, (2004).
4 Jorge Dominguez, The Curious Case of the CHAOS Report (2009), Project Smart, 2009
5 Evertsso, G. (2002). Inspection vs. Testing, Blekinge Institute of Technology Software Verification and Validation (PAD001) from http://www.guzzzt.com/files/coding/inspectionvstesting.pdf
6 Ackerman, A. F., Buchwald, L. S., and Lewsky, F. H., (1989). Software Inspections: An Effective Verification Process. IEEE Software, 6(3), pp.31-36.
7 Department of Computer Science University of Toronto (2001), Inspections & Reviews from http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/CSC444F/slides/L09-Inspections.pdf
8 Glenford J. M., (2004). The Art of Software Testing, Second Edition, 5(21), pp.8
9 Types of software Testing, from http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/types-of-software-testing/
10 John E. Bentley, Software Testing Fundamentals—Concepts, Roles, and Terminology, Wachovia Bank, Charlotte NC, pp. 141 – 30.
11 Haughey, D., PMP, project smart (2000-2011), Why software projects fail and how to make them succeed, 1-2
12 Suzuki, T., (2011), Quality Improvement by the Real-Time Detection of the Problems, 15: 1- 6
13 Senyard A., and Michlmayr M.(2004). How to Have a Successful Free Software Project, from http://www.cyrius.com/publications/senyard_michlmayr-successful_project.pdf
14 Zrie, M., (2010), Software Project plan Structure, from http://www.zriel.com/lamp/49-software-project-plan-structure
Dr. Ayman E. Khedr
- Egypt
Mr. Ahmed Fouad Omran
Faisal Islamic Bank, Egypt - Egypt
ahmed_fouad2025@yahoo.com