Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Implicit Followership Theories In Organisational Settings and The Need to Account for Environmental Factors
Pui Yee Lee
Pages - 1 - 23     |    Revised - 28-07-2021     |    Published - 20-12-2021
Volume - 0   Issue - 0    |    Publication Date - December 20, 2021  Table of Contents
Implicit Followership Theories (IFTs), Followership, Organisational Behaviour, Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs), Leadership.
The introduction of implicit theories into organisational studies have beckoned renewed interest in the field of leadership and followership. Implicit Followership Theories (IFTs) in particular have been linked to follower job satisfaction, performance, leader liking and leader-follower relationships. Though the study of IFTs is relatively new, it seems to be trailing behind as compared to its counterpart, Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs). This paper therefore aims to review and critique the research that has been conducted thus far on IFTs that are relevant to organisational studies, highlighting the gaps in the field that calls for fulfilling in pursuance of IFTs prominence in organisational studies. More specifically, we draw insight from focusing on environmental and contextual factors as a compelling antecedent towards the determination of IFTs. From this research, we have discovered that while this point of view is not unfamiliar, it has remained as a secondary focal point to other factors. Variations between varying environments brought by the cultural difference of nations were observed in literature where independent studies were conducted yet overlooked as a consequence of experimentation. Results obtained therefore prove a demand for explicit and extensive studies to observe the diversity of IFTs from different environmental and cultural backgrounds.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Chao, G. T., & Bauer, T. N. (2017). Taking stock of two relational aspects of organizational life: Tracing the history and shaping the future of socialization and mentoring research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000086.
Andersen, S. M., & Cole, S. W. (1990). "Do I Know You?" : The Role of Significant Others in General Social Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 384-399.
Atkins, P. and Wood, R. (2002). Self-versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55(4), pp.871-904.
Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F. and Weber, T. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), pp.421-449.
Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. and Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), pp.323-370.
Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez Bark, A., Junker, N. and van Dick, R. (2017). Think manager-think male, think follower-think female: Gender bias in implicit followership theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(7), pp.377-388.
Carsten, M., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B., Patera, J. and McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), pp.543-562.
Chaleff, I. (1995). The courageous follower. 1st ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, pp.4-36.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1329.
Coyle, P. and Foti, R. (2014). If You’re Not With Me You’re . . . ? Examining Prototypes and Cooperation in Leader–Follower Relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), pp.161-174.
Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L. and Leoni, L. (2021). Back to the Future: A Review and Editorial Agenda of the International Journal of Business Research and Management. International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), 12(1), pp. 16-33.
Derks, B., Van Laar, C. and Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), pp.456-469.
Dunham, R. and Holzinger, I. (2006). Leader and follower prototypes in an international context: An exploratory study on Asia and South America. ASAC 2006, pp.218-232.
Duong, J. (2011). Leaders’ Conceptions and Evaluations of Followers as Antecedents of Leadership Style, Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Outcomes. Doctoral Dissertation, Los Angeles, CA: Alliant International University, Marshall Goldsmith School of Management.
Eagly, A. and Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), pp.573-598.
Eden, D. & Leviatan, U. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behaviour scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(6), pp.736–741.
Eden, D. (1992). Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(4), pp.271-305.
Engle, E. and Lord, R. (1997). Implicit Theories, Self-Schemas, and Leader-Member Exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), pp.988-1010.
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability Over Time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 293-310.
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S. and Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), pp.858-881.
Foti, R., Hansbrough, T., Epitropaki, O. and Coyle, P. (2017). Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), pp.261-267.
Foti, R., Knee, R. and Backert, R. (2008). Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), pp.178-194.
Gordon, R. and Arvey, R. (2004). Age Bias in Laboratory and Field Settings: A Meta-Analytic Investigation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), pp.468-492.
Goswami, A., Park, H. I., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Does the congruence between leaders’ implicit followership theories and their perceptions of actual Followers matter?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(4), 519-538.
Graen, G. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), pp.219-247.
Guo, S. (2018). The Review of the Implicit Followership Theories (IFTs). Psychology, 09(04), pp.623-632.
Hanges, P., Lord, R. and Dickson, M. (2000). An Information‐processing Perspective on Leadership and Culture: A Case for Connectionist Architecture. Applied Psychology, 49(1), pp.133-161.
Heilman, M. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, pp.113-135.
Hernandez Bark, A., Escartín, J., Schuh, S. and van Dick, R. (2016). Who Leads More and Why? A Mediation Model from Gender to Leadership Role Occupancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), pp.473-483.
Hoption, C., Christie, A. and Barling, J. (2012). Submitting to the Follower Label. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220(4), pp.221-230.
Junker, N. and van Dick, R. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(6), pp.1154-1173.
Junker, N., Schyns, B., Dick, R. and Scheurer, S. (2011). The importance of leader categorization for commitment, job satisfaction, and well-being with particular consideration of gender role theory. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 55(4), pp.171-179.
Junker, N., Stegmann, S., Braun, S. and Van Dick, R. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower – advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), pp.1205-1222.
Kedharnath, U. (2014). Abusive Supervision and Employee Perceptions of Leaders' Implicit Followership Theories, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Colorado.
Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership. 1st ed. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Press, pp.3-96.
Kelley, R. (1992). The power of followership. 1st ed. New York: Doubleday/Currency, pp.11-49.
Kite, M., Stockdale, G., Whitley, B. and Johnson, B. (2005). Attitudes Toward Younger and Older Adults: An Updated Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), pp.241-266.
Kopelman, R. E., Prottas, D. J., & Falk, D. W. (2012). Further development of a measure of theory X and Y managerial assumptions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24, 450–470.
Krings, F., Sczesny, S. and Kluge, A. (2011). Stereotypical Inferences as Mediators of Age Discrimination: The Role of Competence and Warmth. British Journal of Management, 22(2), pp.187-201.
Lai, J., Chow, C. and Loi, R. (2016). The interactive effect of LMX and LMX differentiation on followers’ job burnout: evidence from tourism industry in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(12), pp.1972-1998.
Lawrence, T. (2017). Followership in a global context: Examining the relationship between chinese national culture and follower role orientation. Indiana Institute of Technology, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Leung, A. and Sy, T. (2018). I Am as Incompetent as the Prototypical Group Member: An Investigation of Naturally Occurring Golem Effects in Work Groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 15, pp. 47-119). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Lord, R. and Brown, D. (2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. 1st ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.1-223.
Lord, R. and Maher, K. (1993). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking perceptions and performance. 1st ed. London: Routledge, pp.142-191.
Lord, R. and Shondrick, S. (2011). Leadership and knowledge: Symbolic, connectionist, and embodied perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), pp.207-222.
Lord, R., Foti, R. and De Vader, C. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), pp.343-378.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. 1st ed. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
McGregor, J. and Gray, L. (2002). Stereotypes and older workers: The New Zealand experience. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 18, pp.163-177.
Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure Dynamics and Change. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, pp.233-364.
Rosenberg, S., & Jones, R. (1972). A method for investigating and representing a person's implicit theory of personality: Theodore Dreiser's view of people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(3), pp.372-386.
Shondrick, S. and Lord, R. (2010). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories: Dynamic Structures for Leadership Perceptions, Memory, Leader-Follower Processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010, 25, pp.1-33.
Shondrick, S., Dinh, J. and Lord, R. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), pp.959-978.
Sin, H.-P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1048-1057.
Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), pp.73-84.
Sy, T. (2013). An indirect measure of IFTs using a projective approach. Unpublished Manuscript.
Thompson, P., Glasø, L. and Matthiesen, S. (2018). The way I see you. Implicit followership theories explored through the lens of attachment. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 21(2), pp.85-105.
Tram-Quon, S. (2013). An Exploratory Study on the Development of an Implicit Measure of Implicit Followership Theory Using the Implicit Association Test. UC Riverside: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Tsai, C., Dionne, S., Wang, A., Spain, S., Yammarino, F. and Cheng, B. (2017). Effects of relational schema congruence on leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), pp.268-284.
Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. and Scandura, T. (2000). Implications of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) for Strategic Human Resource Management Systems: Relationships as Social Capital for Competitive Advantage. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, pp.137-185.
Uhlmann, E., Leavitt, K., Menges, J., Koopman, J., Howe, M. and Johnson, R. (2012). Getting Explicit About the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for Their Use in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), pp.553-601.
Van Gils, S., Van Quaquebeke, N. and Van Knippenberg, D. (2009). The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), pp.333-363.
Van Quaquebeke, N. and Brodbeck, F. (2008). Development and first validation of two scales to measure leader categorization in German-speaking countries. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 52(2), pp.70-80.
Van Quaquebeke, N., Van Knippenberg, D. and Brodbeck, F. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates' self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), pp.367-382.
Whiteley, P., Sy, T. and Johnson, S. (2012). Leaders' conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), pp.822-834.
Wofford, J. C., & Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), pp.161-186.
Yip, J. & Herbert Walker, D.O.H. (2021). Leaders mentoring others: the effects of implicit followership theory on leader integrity and mentoring. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. pp.1-31.
Miss Pui Yee Lee
School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS - United Kingdom